Please help check if there is any unnatural expression Q: Lectures used to be a way to teach large numbers of students, but with technology available for education, there is no justification for lectures. To what extent you agree or disagree? Some people argue that lectures are no longer necessary with the availability of technology for educational purposes. While I agree that technological developments are of great value in teaching, I also agree that there are grounds for delivering lectures to a large group of students. On the one hand, technology certainly plays an essential role in teaching because it can be used as a supplement to traditional lectures. Teachers today are adept at using the internet where they can collect a wide range of cases and vivid images. After the class, teachers often give and receive homework through the internet, including email, social media platforms etc. For example, in China, teachers of primary school typically assign homework via WeChat group, which allows students to hand in their assignments online and to receive feedback from their teachers immediately. However, I disagree with the idea that lectures have no place in educating a large number of students for the importance of face-to-face interaction. If lecturers have a good speech skill, a large group of students are likely to be affected by the atmosphere on site and inspired by the engaging contents that they deliver. Hopefully, students’ interests in learning might be also ignited, which can be beneficial for them in the long term. All of which could result in a better teaching effect in comparison with virtual interaction. In conclusion, although technology has an important role to play in education, I believe that traditional lectures should continue to be a teaching method when it comes to teaching large quantities of students.