Search from various Engels teachers...
Lily
I haven't seen him in years. She said she hadn't seen him in years.
Is this correct, or do I need to change "in years" to something else? Thanks!
5 dec. 2014 15:28
Antwoorden · 5
2
Both are fine. You could say, "I haven't seen him FOR years," as well.
If you want to go to the future... then you need 'for.' ('in' doesn't work). I won't/mightn't/shan't see him for years. However, word it differently and 'in' works: I'll see him in a few years.
But for the present and past: I haven't seen him in/for years, I hadn't seen him in/for years.
Also, I didn't see him for years. I think it sounds odd to use 'in' here. With 'didn't' - but perhaps that's just me!
5 december 2014
1
I'm guessing that you're asking about changing a sentence from direct to indirect speech. What you have written is correct. The phrase 'in years' doesn't change
when you put the sentence into indirect speech.
5 december 2014
1
Both are correct.
5 december 2014
Heb je je antwoorden nog steeds niet gevonden?
Schrijf je vragen op en laat de moedertaalsprekers je helpen!
Lily
Taalvaardigheden
Arabisch, Engels, Frans
Taal die wordt geleerd
Engels, Frans
Artikelen die je misschien ook leuk vindt

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
18 likes · 16 Opmerkingen

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
15 likes · 12 Opmerkingen

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
13 likes · 6 Opmerkingen
Meer artikelen
