Search from various Engels teachers...
Haru
The difference between 'there was no bus' and 'there were no trains'
- We had to walk because there was no bus.
- There are no trains today. The drivers are on strike.
There are examples from a textbook. I'm wondering why 'bus' is singular in the first example but 'train' plural in the second. Can I say 'there were no buses' or 'There was no train' instead?
30 dec. 2015 02:37
Antwoorden · 5
4
Hello Haru,
The difference has to do with circumstance. In the first sentence, a certain bus did not show up. There is only one bus.
In the second sentence, there isn't a single train in operation because the drivers are on strike. All trains won't be running that day.
You could say "there are no buses" if there was a city holiday or a strike and all of the buses weren't running and similarly you could say "there was no train" if a particular train didn't show up.
The two are not interchangeable and depend entirely on the circumstances.
Hope that helps!
30 december 2015
1
It depends on context. If you would only expect to have one, then it is singular. Which i think makes sense since not all the buses can get oneself where, specifically, one wants to go.
30 december 2015
Heb je je antwoorden nog steeds niet gevonden?
Schrijf je vragen op en laat de moedertaalsprekers je helpen!
Haru
Taalvaardigheden
Engels, Duits, Japans, Latijn
Taal die wordt geleerd
Engels, Latijn
Artikelen die je misschien ook leuk vindt

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
18 likes · 16 Opmerkingen

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
15 likes · 12 Opmerkingen

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
13 likes · 6 Opmerkingen
Meer artikelen
