Vind Engels Leerkrachten
Danyel
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе...
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
&
Thе cakе would havе been burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
What is the difference?
29 apr. 2017 09:35
Antwoorden · 2
1
As Micahel helpfully explains, "the cake would have burnt" is referring to the action of the cake burning, whereas "the cake would have been burnt" refers to the final result - a burnt cake!
---
Want to learn English the SMART (Stretch, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely) way with me? Go to my teacher profile and book your $1 trial lesson now!
http://bit.ly/paulblakemanitalkiteacher
29 april 2017
1
to be burnt - burnt is a past participle which is being used as an adjective to describe the state of the cake.
to burn - verb to describe the activity in this case within itself (the cake); there is no direct object
There is no significant difference in meaning in this case.
29 april 2017
Heb je je antwoorden nog steeds niet gevonden?
Schrijf je vragen op en laat de moedertaalsprekers je helpen!
Danyel
Taalvaardigheden
Wit-Russisch, Engels, Frans, Pools, Russisch, Oekraïens
Taal die wordt geleerd
Engels, Pools
Artikelen die je misschien ook leuk vindt

Speak More Fluently with This Simple Technique
14 likes · 2 Opmerkingen

How to Read and Understand a Business Contract in English
16 likes · 3 Opmerkingen

6 Ways italki Can Help You Succeed in Your School Language Classes
12 likes · 7 Opmerkingen
Meer artikelen