Search from various Engels teachers...
Ghazal
Hi . About passive
Hi
I came across this sentence " players pretend to have been fouled " .
I want to know why it is used " have been fouled " after to ?
I know it is passive but why past participle ?
I've learnd to + verb is infinitive
Why didn't writer said " players pretend to be fouled "
Is there any diferentce ?
Thank you
28 mrt. 2020 08:47
Antwoorden · 3
2
Jaren is right, it depends on what time period you are referring to.
We use the past participle in the passive
- (be + past participle)
For example, “First, Apples are chopped and placed in a bowl”. (Present passive).
“Computers have been used in offices for over twenty years” (Present Perfect Passive)
We use the passive when we don’t want to emphasise the person who did the action, or the person is not important.
Quentin Tarantino directed Pulp Fiction (ACTIVE)
Pulp Fiction was directed by Quentin Tarantino
(PASSIVE)
28 maart 2020
Thank Jaren for help
28 maart 2020
The difference between these sentences is very subtle.
If you were to say “players pretended to be fouled”, it means that they pretended at a specific point in the past, but now they are done pretending.
If you say “players pretend to have been fouled”, it means they are still pretending this past occurrence took place.
28 maart 2020
Heb je je antwoorden nog steeds niet gevonden?
Schrijf je vragen op en laat de moedertaalsprekers je helpen!
Ghazal
Taalvaardigheden
Engels, Frans, Perzisch (Farsi)
Taal die wordt geleerd
Engels, Frans
Artikelen die je misschien ook leuk vindt

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
18 likes · 14 Opmerkingen

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
15 likes · 12 Opmerkingen

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
12 likes · 6 Opmerkingen
Meer artikelen
