can you help me in correcting this sentence? thanks you measure the way, the speed, the pattern of planets moving based on what you saw where etc. the moon is moving around the earth moving around the sun moving around the center of galaxy under the effect from the so-called dark-matter. So how can you be sure that with the dark matter, the whole universe will be moving faster or the dark matter is accelerating the whole universe? can you help me on this? thanks

is the sentence grammatically correct? people not easy 'to' get hurt are also not easy 'to' get recovered once get hurt... are the 'to's necessary? thanks

could you help me on the correction? You gave your prime time to someone with whom, now, you regret to be together. And just yesterday you came up from nowhere telling me that I am the right one who is worth of you with the rest of your life... Do you even think it acceptable? Let alone putting you into my case(I want to say: put you into my shoes or something like that). would you mind correcting this? I just want it sound like more native and colorful. if you aren't aware of what I am trying to say. just let me know... thanks a lot

An grammatical question! thanks I will not be lectured to the moment you walk in the door! I called Catherine, as promised. Her inability to deliver is not my problem or my fault. I can not control changing global landscapes. And I will not be cornered into making promised I can not deliver! --- house of cards why the fifth word from the end is not 'promises', but 'promised'?

Hey! everybody! Merry Christmas! Hi, Merry Christmas! I wish all of you will be happy everyday!!! thanks all of my language partners! without you I can barely speak English!!! thanks!!!! fully indebted!!! Lei(Ray)

Hi everybody a Q one of my colleagues argued a Q with me about whether "there is no people" or "there are no people" my point is that there is no people implies a Negtive then there is no "there are no people". his point is that there are no people means there are a few people, the amount of them are more than 2. which one is correct and grammatically makes sense? thanks

Questions about House of Card 1-9, France made whole plan to provoke Mathew, the VP to replace the next gavorner of the state of Pennsylvania. However on the other side he took the best of his ability in makeing the water bill pass, which didnt pass. # question: what, if the bill passed, the whole plan would be? 1-13, France lit up his hope, but blew off others next to him and then his. # question: what does that mean? he has not faith in god? I have a pile of this kind of questions for I am lack of American background knowledge.

Questions about House of Card story line 1-3, claire was running at graveyard, the old lady yelled: " it' s disgraceful, have you no respect?" the end of the episode, claire saw two teenageers making love at graveyard. # question: what' s the purpose of author showing this? and there is scenario where claire was talking this to France, but the call was incidentally interrupted by Zoe. # question: what would france say? 2-4 to 2-5, France showed up at his mother university in the 2 episodes, and the chinese telecom giant Feng. and the actor playing France' s great great father led him to meet Feng. # question: is him one of Franc' s man? that doesnt make sense, the actor looks serious. or France knew about his great great father and the place he died, and setup a meeting like that with Feng?

could you help me on the compress the sentence? 1, ver.1, the risk comes along with that you do not know what you are doing, not what you are doing! ver.2, there wont be any risk if you know what you are doing! ver.3, there is no more risky than not aware what you are doing! 2, ver.1, there is no great saying.what does matter is finding your way to go. ver.2, there wont be any great sayings if you know yourself well and you know what to do next but not blindly to follow others' s saying. ver.3, great sayings came out from individuals who must have done history.first, you might be one of them, but you cannot succeed under the idea, the saying again; second, the saying in past is not applicable in future. Sorry, first bringing those sentences. Second, thanks a lot for your kind corrections LOL.