What's the difference between unable and incapable? https://i.gyazo.com/6ef9978c3e9ef39df6dca18df9c45e73.png for example in this image, the correct word appears to be incapable, but I'd put unable

Is it "for" used as because a frequent for native's writings? So since I started to read books in english I noticed this was a thing, and pretty often, but when studying english I was never taught this way of using for, the only alternatives for because I knew were as and since. So is it common? Should I use it on my writings?

What's the difference between use and usage?

Report on a career guidance held in a school. The careers day’s event recently held in the school has been really handy for pupils who were doubtful about their path in the upcoming times. This report’s purpose is to remark on which aspects were more successful in contrast to the lacking ones. Selecting appropriate works When taking into consideration whether a job is recommendable or not, the youth might not have the necessary resources for it. Therefore, it stands to reason that this section of the guide was extremely popular among them. Comparing salaries to the working time required, taking into account future possible progression in the business or the promotion limits, and identifying a healthy mood within the company, are essential things to be aware of when moving into the labour scene. Job solicitation texts Alternatively, while it is crucial to be able to write proper application texts, it is not a particularly demanding thing since as long as people have common sense, they will know how to express themselves in a more formal and professional way. If I were to choose anything that was to be replaced, I would take this part. Job interviews guidance Despite the behaviour and manners needed on a job interview being frequently known, there are other subtle facts and nuances that gives you advantages when taking one. For instance, the body language, which is not common knowledges in many cases, or adaptability on clothing depending on the type of job you are aiming at. Consequently, this section should be probably maintained as well. Recommendations As stated in most of the report, the event has been successful enough to guarantee it keeps happening over time. Nevertheless, for further improvements, something like curriculum management and designing would work better as a replacement for job application writing advising.

Are however and nevertheless always interchangeable? Also which one feels more "high" leveled. I tend to use however too much in my writings and I'm wondering whether I should switch to nevertheless (c1 level)

Letter to a newspaper editor about children barely playing outside nowadays. (C1?) Dear editor: I am writing on regard of your recent article about children’s leisure time usage. While it raises some reasonable points, I believe you are missing relevant aspects. Firstly, it is hardly refutable that nowadays, childhood is enjoyed in a large variety of ways compared to previous times. However, I do not agree with the claim that it is only due to computer games and the development of technology in general. There are other circumstances to bear in mind such as the safety of the streets which are definitely not as secure as they used to be, therefore infants cannot possibly go outside by themselves. That added to the lesser time parents dispose of recently they can results in the most crucial reason as to why is less frequent to see children enjoying themselves outdoors. Letting that aside, the main purpose of my letter, is to debate whether them being into indoors/technology based hobbies is actually that disastrous or harming as you suggest. Although, surely it is beneficial for them to play in the parks and socialise with each other, there exist a big deal of scientific studies that proves other kind of profits for their brain such as better reaction time, improved imagination and detail catching among others. Besides the fact that a decent amount of things can be learned through internet, and even videogames. Summing up, the idea I want to share is, let us avoid these old-fashioned thoughts and feelings about mixing children with technology being unfruitful and mostly prejudicial, and let others be fond of whatever they decide to. Sincerely, Seth.

Essay about encouraging young people into studying scientific degrees. There are many reasons that people would argue as the cause of young people not being so keen on science and studying it. From my point of view the two key factors about it are the poor management of science teaching on early education, and the economic viability on scientific careers that might require too much effort for not so high earnings. On the one hand, most of us have probably experienced the way science is taught at school. Not only is it basically all theoretical and dense, but also it is not frequently related to student’s interests. Therefore, most of pupils take it as a burden they just must endure, and do not get attracted by it. If only teachers could make its teaching more practical and find a way to mix with some topics that are closer to learner’s curiosity then it would probably work better. On the other hand, there is the fact that the economy does not benefit pure scientifics careers such as mathematician or physicist, as much as perhaps doctors, professional athletes or having a business. Moreover, pure science studies are extremely demanding, thereby not receiving a large income or at least a safe and stable job will surely make people discard these careers. If the government guaranteed any of these, then an increasing number of people would start considering these. And it is undeniable that science is one of the most essential engines of a country’s productivity. To conclude, although both aspect are crucial, I am inclined to believe that the schooling one is the most decisive, since from my experience it is normal to go after what really fulfil your expectatives and getting the population into science at early ages can make the difference.

C1 essay simulation. Topic: How to encourage young people into studying scientific degrees There are many reasons that people would argue as the cause of young people not being so keen on science and studying it. From my point of view the two key factors about it are the poor management of science teaching on early education, and the economic viability on scientific careers that might require too much effort for not so high earnings. On the one hand, most of us have probably experienced the way science is taught at school. Not only is it basically all theoretical and dense, but also it is not frequently related to student’s interests. Therefore, most of pupils take it as a burden they just must endure, and do not get attracted by it. If only teachers could make its teaching more practical and find a way to mix with some topics that are closer to learner’s curiosity then it would probably work better. On the other hand, there is the fact that the economy does not benefit pure scientifics careers such as mathematician or physicist, as much as perhaps doctors, professional athletes or having a business. Moreover, pure science studies are extremely demanding, thereby not receiving a large income or at least a safe and stable job will surely make people discard these careers. If the government guaranteed any of these, then an increasing number of people would start considering these. And it is undeniable that science is one of the most essential engines of a country’s productivity. To conclude, although both aspect are crucial, I am inclined to believe that the schooling one is the most decisive, since from my experience it is normal to go after what really fulfil your expectatives and getting the population into science at early ages can make the difference.