What is the inner relations between William and pears? William had shaken pears and then became William Shakespeare.

Is the sentence grammatically correct and natural?

Question

What is the inner relations between William and pears? William had shaken pears and then became William Shakespeare.

Is the sentence grammatically correct and natural?

Answer

Two parts to my answer:

1. The grammar is not correct "inner relations" is plural, so you need "are" not "is". Or you need to change "relations" to  the singular "relation".

2. Is it natural? No, not really. I think that you could improve things a bit by changing"inner relations" to "relationship", and maybe the second sentence to "William shook some pears and thus he became known as William Shakespeare."  ... but still it's quite an unnatural thing to say because "Shakespeare" isn't pronounced as "Shakes-pear"...we say "Shakes-spear" , so the whole thing would work better if the first sentence was about the relationship between William and spears.

Answer

Relationship

William shook pears

I think some people are missing the joke!

Answer

The sentence is not grammatically correct, and its meaning is unclear. There is no inherent relationship between William and pears, and shaking pears would not result in becoming William Shakespeare.

If you could provide more context or clarify your question, I would be happy to assist you further.

Answer

Yeah, I agree with the others. To the the pun right, he should shake SPEARS.

Nie przegap okazji, by nauczyć się języka w zaciszu własnego domu. Przejrzyj naszą ofertę doświadczonych korepetytorów i zapisz się na pierwszą lekcję już teraz!