Szukaj różnych nauczycieli angielski...
Alexander
Is it correct that in “I wouldn't be sure that it was profitable in 5 years” we don't need the second “would” when talking about the future relative to “be sure”?
2 sie 2026 04:40
Odpowiedzi · 12
2
Yes, that's correct.
After expressions such as "I wouldn't be sure", "I don't think", or "I doubt", we often use the past tense to refer to a future situation from the speaker's point of view.
So:
"I wouldn't be sure that it was profitable in five years."
is perfectly natural.
You could also say:
"I wouldn't be sure that it would be profitable in five years."
if you want to emphasise the future outcome itself, but the second "would" is optional rather than required.
In other words, the first version is completely grammatical and is probably the more natural choice in everyday English.
2 sie 2026 17:04
1
I agree with Gareth Todd.
2 sie 2026 17:33
1
Your phrase is okay but native speakers might say "I'm not sure that it will be profitable in 5 years."
That's right, no 2nd would needed.
2 sie 2026 08:19
Nadal nie znalazłeś/łaś odpowiedzi?
Napisz swoje pytania i pozwól, aby rodzimi użytkownicy języka ci pomogli!
Alexander
Znajomość języków
angielski, ukraiński
Język do nauczenia się
angielski
Artykuły, które również mogą ci się spodobać

How to Work Effectively with International Teams
10 głosy poparcia · 2 Komentarze

Why Do People Still Ask You to Repeat Yourself?
21 głosy poparcia · 11 Komentarze

Why Your English Textbooks Didn’t Prepare You for Fast-Paced Meetings
18 głosy poparcia · 8 Komentarze
Więcej artykułów
