Basically, asking for your opinion about this explannation i've just made comes from a moment i got corrected by a friend of mine. I made a sentence with "get passive", and she said that it didn't make any sense. So, i as an English tutor was too shocked to ignore the comment and started to google all about the difference between be passive and get passive!. I'm looking forward to somebody who would like to appreciate [1]+[2] and share opinions! [1] It's needless to say that passive voice is a sure evidence that leads you to an advanced level of English. Thus, It's highly important to understand for what situation in particular we use it. Firstly, active voice as a clear statement is to show a subject performs the action, followed by the typical word order without any particular attitude, opinion or feeling that is expressed. On the other hand, Sentences in a passive form, based on only transitive verbs, bring an emphasis or focus to the action or the recipient of the action rather than the agent(doer=subject). However, it doesn't mean that they refer to nothing about the agent because passive voice specifically divides it into various types such as unknown, unimportant, distanced and neutral Overall, there's a recipient of the action rather than an agent of verb(the doer=subject) when it comes to passive voice. It's often optional but undesirable to add "by phrases" to the end of the passive sentences in order to clarify who does the action. [2] be passive "be+passive" can be preferable in a sense that it's used with most of the transitive verbs in general. However, it could sound unclear, unnatural and too formal depending on the context. get passive "Get passive" Its use has a high tendency in informal speaking with various forms, etc. However, the sentences you make with it can go totally wrong in terms of certain rules and the nuance it has. Thus, it's desirable to utilise "get+passive" after you get good examples from native English speakers.