Ryota
I've learned that after subordinate conjunctions a subject can be omitted when the subject matches the one in the main clause. I recognize “than” as a subordinate conjunction, but in the subordinate clause in the sentence below it is ‘land and water’ that is omitted. Not ‘they’. Why is that possible? “Plant-based meats have been gaining popularity. One U.S. company is using mushroom root to make its products. They use less land and water than is needed to raise animal meat and produce, which in turn lowers greenhouse gas emissions.”
17 gru 2023 13:11
Odpowiedzi · 4
The subjects do not match. Also, "than" is used as a preposition in your sentence, not a conjunction. "Than" is used to introduce the second element in a comparison. The word "is" superfluous, plays no role, and you can omit it: "less land and water than needed". The subordinate clause has no subject and no verb.
17 grudnia 2023
You've got the right idea. To replace all the words that have been omitted for the sake of brevity would make the sentence repetitive and overly wordy: They use less land and water than the amount of land and water that is needed to raise animal meat and produce, which in turn lowers greenhouse gas emissions.”
17 grudnia 2023
Nadal nie znalazłeś/łaś odpowiedzi?
Napisz swoje pytania i pozwól, aby rodzimi użytkownicy języka ci pomogli!