Search from various angielski teachers...
nozturk
You haven't seen nothing yet! Is it gramamtically correct?
21 paź 2011 15:54
Odpowiedzi · 7
3
It's not correct. The correct sentence should be either "you haven't seen anything yet" or "you have seen nothing yet"
21 października 2011
2
It contains a double negative which is not appropriate usage of English, but it is very common.
You haven't seen anything yet. Or. You have seen nothing yet. Or. You've seen nothing yet. All are correct
21 października 2011
2
No, it is not.
21 października 2011
1
No, it is not because it has a double negative. You can say " You haven't seen anything yet!" or " You have seen nothing yet!".
21 października 2011
It's grammatically wrong in two different ways:
Proper English - the double negative gives a positive meaning. Literally, you are saying "You have still seen something!" Your correct sentence should be "You haven't seen anything yet." Note how the negative is placed as early as possible.
Slang English - the pedantic use of a clean present perfect is inappropriate if you're aiming for a slang sentence (yes, slang also follows its own grammar rules!). It should be written, "You ain't seen nothing yet!"
21 października 2011
Pokaż więcej
Nadal nie znalazłeś/łaś odpowiedzi?
Napisz swoje pytania i pozwól, aby rodzimi użytkownicy języka ci pomogli!
nozturk
Znajomość języków
angielski, turecki
Język do nauczenia się
angielski
Artykuły, które również mogą ci się spodobać

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
19 głosy poparcia · 16 Komentarze

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
15 głosy poparcia · 12 Komentarze

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
13 głosy poparcia · 6 Komentarze
Więcej artykułów
