The plural of fish is fish. Same as the plural of sheep being sheep. There's a pretty cool reason why this is so. :)
You would only see "fishes" in Biblical texts, or to mean "different types of fish" (a very uncommon usage).
26 lipca 2014
0
3
2
The plural is 'fish'.
'Fishes' exists, but is very rare. If you said it in normal conversation, you would sound very childish. English-speaking children of two or three years old often say 'fishes'.
26 lipca 2014
0
2
2
It's just fish. One fish, two fish, three fish.
Nice and simple.
26 lipca 2014
0
2
0
Hello,
You might be interested in this explanation from the Australian Museum as to how sometimes "fishes" is correctly used.
http://australianmuseum.net.au/fish-and-fishes
I agree with the other members here that we normally just use "fish" as the plural for "fish".
I must say, however, the phenomen of an adult talking like a two-year-old child (see Su.Ki.'s post) could be highly attractive.
27 lipca 2014
0
0
Nadal nie znalazłeś/łaś odpowiedzi?
Napisz swoje pytania i pozwól, aby rodzimi użytkownicy języka ci pomogli!