Znajdź nauczycieli angielski
Lily
I haven't seen him in years. She said she hadn't seen him in years.
Is this correct, or do I need to change "in years" to something else? Thanks!
5 gru 2014 15:28
Odpowiedzi · 5
2
Both are fine. You could say, "I haven't seen him FOR years," as well.
If you want to go to the future... then you need 'for.' ('in' doesn't work). I won't/mightn't/shan't see him for years. However, word it differently and 'in' works: I'll see him in a few years.
But for the present and past: I haven't seen him in/for years, I hadn't seen him in/for years.
Also, I didn't see him for years. I think it sounds odd to use 'in' here. With 'didn't' - but perhaps that's just me!
5 grudnia 2014
1
I'm guessing that you're asking about changing a sentence from direct to indirect speech. What you have written is correct. The phrase 'in years' doesn't change
when you put the sentence into indirect speech.
5 grudnia 2014
1
Both are correct.
5 grudnia 2014
Nadal nie znalazłeś/łaś odpowiedzi?
Napisz swoje pytania i pozwól, aby rodzimi użytkownicy języka ci pomogli!
Lily
Znajomość języków
arabski, angielski, francuski
Język do nauczenia się
angielski, francuski
Artykuły, które również mogą ci się spodobać

Speak More Fluently with This Simple Technique
7 głosy poparcia · 2 Komentarze

How to Read and Understand a Business Contract in English
15 głosy poparcia · 3 Komentarze

6 Ways italki Can Help You Succeed in Your School Language Classes
12 głosy poparcia · 7 Komentarze
Więcej artykułów