Goga
a question In a New Headway book I came accross this question - Why were luxuries, not necessities, the earliest goods to be traded? What is the construction of - to be traded- Is it infinitive present passive? Shouldn't it be - that were traded.
13 gru 2016 11:06
Odpowiedzi · 4
1
Yes - passive present infinitive. This is correct, and your alternative is also correct.
13 grudnia 2016
I think the first one is something that has to be done in the future and the second one is something that was done in the past. Am I correct?
15 grudnia 2016
A question to you: what do you think the difference is between "the earliest goods to be traded" and "the earliest goods that were traded"? :)
13 grudnia 2016
Nadal nie znalazłeś/łaś odpowiedzi?
Napisz swoje pytania i pozwól, aby rodzimi użytkownicy języka ci pomogli!