Search from various angielski teachers...
Zewei
Is there two ways to understand it?
Thus, women in education are more likely to become teachers than school administrators.
1: Women in education and school administrators are likely to become teachers but women has higher possibility.
2:Women in education are likely to be teachers, but are not likely to be admonistrators.
According to the first sentence and its syntax. Are two understandings above are correct? If not, why?
11 lis 2017 15:18
Odpowiedzi · 2
1
The intended meaning is the second meaning: Women who go into the field of education are more likely to become teachers than to become school administrators.
The sentence is ambiguous because it omits some words that would add clarity, so you have to rely on context and plausibility. The sentence is intended to mean: “Women in education are more likely to become teachers than [to become] school administrators.” If the other meaning were intended (strange as such a meaning would be) you could write: “Women in education are more likely to become teachers than school administrators [are].”
11 listopada 2017
Nadal nie znalazłeś/łaś odpowiedzi?
Napisz swoje pytania i pozwól, aby rodzimi użytkownicy języka ci pomogli!
Zewei
Znajomość języków
chiński (mandaryński), angielski, japoński
Język do nauczenia się
angielski, japoński
Artykuły, które również mogą ci się spodobać

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
14 głosy poparcia · 12 Komentarze

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
15 głosy poparcia · 11 Komentarze

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
12 głosy poparcia · 6 Komentarze
Więcej artykułów