Znajdź nauczycieli angielski
Alik Bairamov
Can I say "I think we've not met before" instead of "I don't think we've met before"?
5 maj 2020 05:47
Odpowiedzi · 6
4
No, we wouldn't say that. We would always phrase this statement as "I don't think we've met before". Or, if you wanted to say 'we've not met before', you'd use a tag question: "We've not met before, have we?"
If you were to say "I think we've not met before" people would understand you, but it would sound strange and unnatural.
A general rule is that we always put the negative element as near to the beginning of the statement as we can.
5 maja 2020
1
"I think we've not met before" is formal and less said.
The 2nd is more idiomatic and far better to say if you want to sound natural.
5 maja 2020
the first option sounds more british. they use "have" in "-'ve" more often. it's unusual to use the negative like that in american english at least. much more common to hear the second
5 maja 2020
Thank you very much, Trisha!
5 maja 2020
You can and will be understood by English speakers, but it sounds quite formal. "I don't think we've met before" is much more common.
5 maja 2020
Nadal nie znalazłeś/łaś odpowiedzi?
Napisz swoje pytania i pozwól, aby rodzimi użytkownicy języka ci pomogli!
Alik Bairamov
Znajomość języków
angielski, rosyjski
Język do nauczenia się
angielski
Artykuły, które również mogą ci się spodobać

Speak More Fluently with This Simple Technique
26 głosy poparcia · 5 Komentarze

How to Read and Understand a Business Contract in English
20 głosy poparcia · 3 Komentarze

6 Ways italki Can Help You Succeed in Your School Language Classes
16 głosy poparcia · 9 Komentarze
Więcej artykułów