vampire
"We have't been there for a long time "or "We have't go there for a long time"? Which is correct? Or which one is better?haven't, sorry:)
2 cze 2010 00:30
Odpowiedzi · 6
3
"We haven't been there for a long time." is correct. if you were using the second one it would be "We haven't GONE there IN a long time." I apologize, Canadian English is apparently different from others. ^^'
2 czerwca 2010
Just in case there is any confusion about the way I responded above, please know that I didn't mean to say "We haven't WENT GONE (not went) there ...". I tried to show that WENT was incorrect and HAVE NOT GONE was correct (WENT had been written in a previous answer). I wish we could use some text formatting features such as 'strikethrough, underlining or other features' that would help distinguish mistakes from corrections.
3 czerwca 2010
hi vampire, the first sentence is correct. please take note that when using present perfect form, the basic formula should be: [has/have + verb (in past participle)] thus, "haven't been" and "haven't gone" are the correct forms. :)
2 czerwca 2010
The first one is correct but the second one should be gone.
2 czerwca 2010
if you were using the second one it would be "We haven't WENT GONE (not went) there IN a long time." "Gone" is called the Past Participle form of the verb "go" (e.g. go/went/gone = present / simple past / past particle (used in the Present Perfect and Past Perfect tenses)
2 czerwca 2010
Nadal nie znalazłeś/łaś odpowiedzi?
Napisz swoje pytania i pozwól, aby rodzimi użytkownicy języka ci pomogli!