which sentence is right? allow or allow for? Here are two sentences: Demoracy allows for many differences of opinion. Demoracy allows many differences of opinion. I know "allow for" means "take into account" or "take into consideration" or etc. But here, what does it mean?

what's the difference between chill and chilly? when we use them as adj. , what's the difference? for example: chill wind, the weather is chilly. I don't know why use the different words here.

What's the difference between "to you" and "for you". For example: Here is a letter for you. I'm writing a letter to you. I've consulted the dictionary for the meaning of them. It said: "to" , used to show the person or thing that receives something. "for", used to show who is intended to have or use something or where something is intended to be put. I, therefore, confused. How can I tell them? I often make the wrong sentences like "here is a letter to you". I think there must be some ways to tell them and use them like these kind of sentences. Pleas help me. Thank you.

Are these two senteces both correct? Here is a sentence which I found it in a book: It's important for a person to have a reputation for being honest. I think another sentence is also correct: It's important for a person to have a reputation of being honest. Am I right? Please give me an answer, Thanks a lot.

be adj to sb,be adj for sb,what's the difference between them? I need somebody give me a way to know how to use them. In some cases, I may confused about these two kinds of sentence.Thanks a lot.For example: This job is important to you.This job is important for you. His parents were equally important for him in his childhood. His parents were equally important to him in his childhood. I think to sb means:to sb's mind, for sb means according to the condition of sb. If I'm right , can I use it in other sentences with the same structure?

He has never been to NewYork. He has never gone to the movies. Here are two sentences. He has never been to New York. He has never gone to the movies. Why do we use "been" not "gone" in the first sentence?

"Smoking is harmful to your health."Why we use "to" but not "for" When we say "smoking is harmful to your health.", I'm confused. I don't know why we don't say smoking is harmful for your health. In fact, I can't understand why we often say it is good/bad for your health. What is the difference between them? please help me , thanks a lot.