difference between "regarding" and "with regard" As per the title, could any native speaker explain to me please?

study for my major part 2. The results from this study are as follows: First, equity ratio of major shareholders as well as equity ratio of foreigners has a positive(+) effect on MTB. On the contrary, equity ratio of institutional investors has a negative(-) effect on it. And while equity ratio of major shareholders were not statistically meaningful, equity ratio of foreigners has a positive(+) effect on ROA, but equity ratio of institutional investors as well as its result on MTB has a negative(-) effect on ROA. Second, construction companies managed by employed expert managers have higher value than owner managed companies on MTB. But, there was no statistically significant difference between employed expert manager companies and owner managed companies on ROA. This study suggests that the study of ownership structure on business performance of construction companies needs to be continuously expanded due to the limit information of the sample companies and the lack of its study, considering its large(or huge?) effect to national economy compared with other industries. Thank you. :D

study for my major part 1. The effect of ownership structure on business performance has been discussed on many previous studies. In this study I focused on the relationship between ownership structure and business performance of Korean Construction companies, and the difference of business performance between owner manager construction companies and employed expert manager construction companies using by analysis of actual proof, since financial crisis in 2008. 33 listed companies for 6 years between 2009 and 2014 are used for this study. To evaluate the effect of ownership structure on business performance, Regression analysis is performed by using Market to Book Financial Ratio(MTB) and Return on Assets(ROA) as measuring variables for business performance. Equity ratio of major shareholders, equity ratio of foreigners and equity ratio of institutional investors(including shareholders who own 5% and above of shares.) were used as measuring variables for ownership structure. And debt ratio, liquidity ratio(cash holding ratio), firm size were used as control variables. With regard to the additional selection, conglomerate status were not used as dummy variables due to all the sample companies are affiliated to their own group. In addition to the effect of ownership structure on business performance, T-test were implemented to find out the difference of business performance between construction companies managed by owners and employed expert managers.

번역 연습 (Korean(한국어) to English) 기업의 소유구조가 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관하여는 기존의 많은 선행 연구에서 분석되고 논의되어 왔으나, It has been analyzed and discussed on previous studies regarding to the effect of ownership structure on business performance, but 본 논문에서는 특히 2008년 금융위기 이후 우리나라 건설기업의 소유구조와 경영성과에 대한 실증분석과 건설업 내에서의 소유경영자와 전문경영자간의 경영성과 차이에 초점을 두고 분석을 실시하였다. in this study I focused and analyzed on the analysis of actual proof between ownership structure and business performance, and differences of business performance between owner manager companies and chief executive officer companies of Korean Construction companies, especially since financial crisis in 2008. 분석대상 기업으로는 상장 건설기업 41개로 2009년부터 2014년까지 6개년 동안의 경영성과를 대상으로 하였으며, Subjects of this analysis are 41 listed companies business performance for 6 years between 2009 and 2014. I'm writing a paper for my master degree and it would be appreciated if anyone can help me with corrections and advice. Thank you. :) 소유구조의 측정변수로는 대주주지분율, 외국인지분율, 기관투자자지분율(기관투자가 및 5% 이상의 주식 취득자 포함)을 이용하였다. Percentage of Major shareholder, Foreigner percentage of shareholding, Institutional investors percentage of shareholding(Institutional investors including shareholders who own above 5% of shares.) are used for measuring variables for ownership structure. 경영성과의 측정변수로는 시장가치 대 장부가치비율(MTB)과 총자산영업이익율(ROA)을, 통제변수로는 부채비율, 유동성비율(현금보유비율), 기업규모, 재벌소속 여부를 사용하여 회귀분석을 실시하였다. Regression analysis is performed by using Market to Book Financial Ratio(MTB) and Return on Assets(ROA) as measuring variables and debt ratio, liquidity ratio(cash holding ratio), firm size, conglomerate as control variable for business performance.

Translation Practice (Korean(한국어) to English)-Part.2 I'm writing a paper for my master degree and i'd be appreciated if anyone help me with corrections. Thank you. :) 본 연구를 통하여 얻어진 결과는 다음과 같다. The result from this study as below. 첫째, 기업의 주요주주지분율 중 외국인지분율은 MTB에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 반면에, First, Foreigner percentage of shareholding affect positive on MTB, 대주주지분율과 기관투자자지분율은 MTB에 부(-)의 영향을 미치며, on the contrary, Percentage of Major shareholder and Institutional investors percentage of shareholding affect negative on MTB, 내부지분율과 외국인지분율은 ROA에 정(+)의 영향을 미치나, 기관투자자지분율은 ROA에 부(-)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. and Percentage of Major shareholder and Foreigner percentage of shareholding affect positive on ROA, but Institutional investors percentage of shareholding affect negative on ROA. 둘째, 종속변수 중 MTB는 전문경영자가 소유경영자보다 높은 것으로 나타난 반면, Second, executive officer companies have high value than owner manager companies on MTB. ROA는 전문경영자와 소유경영자간에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. There was no statistically significant difference between executive officer companies and owner manager companies on ROA. (or When compared with executive officer companies and owner manager companies, neither ROA was not statistically significant.) 본 연구는 건설 산업이 타 산업에 비하여 국민경제에 미치는 파급 효과가 매우 크지만 국내 건설업을 대상으로 한 소유구조와 경영성과에 대한 연구가 드문 편이라는 점을 고려할 때 건설업의 소유구조와 경영성과에 대한 연구는 지속적으로 확대되어야 한다는 점을 시사한다. This study suggests that the study of ownership structure on business performance of construction companies need to be continuously expanded due to the lack of its study, considering its large effect to national economy compared with other industries.

Translation Practice (Korean(한국어) to English)-Part.1 기업의 소유구조가 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관하여는 기존의 많은 선행 연구에서 분석되고 논의되어 왔으나, It has been analyzed and discussed on previous studies regarding to the effect of ownership structure on business performance, but 본 논문에서는 특히 2008년 금융위기 이후 우리나라 건설기업의 소유구조와 경영성과에 대한 실증분석과 건설업 내에서의 소유경영자와 전문경영자간의 경영성과 차이에 초점을 두고 분석을 실시하였다. in this study I focused and analyzed on the analysis of actual proof between ownership structure and business performance, and differences of business performance between owner manager companies and chief executive officer companies of Korean Construction companies, especially since financial crisis in 2008. 분석대상 기업으로는 상장 건설기업 41개로 2009년부터 2014년까지 6개년 동안의 경영성과를 대상으로 하였으며, Subjects of this analysis are 41 listed companies business performance for 6 years between 2009 and 2014. 소유구조의 측정변수로는 대주주지분율, 외국인지분율, 기관투자자지분율(기관투자가 및 5% 이상의 주식 취득자 포함)을 이용하였다. Percentage of Major shareholder, Foreigner percentage of shareholding, Institutional investors percentage of shareholding(Institutional investors including shareholders who own above 5% of shares.) are used for measuring variables for ownership structure. 경영성과의 측정변수로는 시장가치 대 장부가치비율(MTB)과 총자산영업이익율(ROA)을, 통제변수로는 부채비율, 유동성비율(현금보유비율), 기업규모, 재벌소속 여부를 사용하여 회귀분석을 실시하였다. Regression analysis is performed by using Market to Book Financial Ratio(MTB) and Return on Assets(ROA) as measuring variables and debt ratio, liquidity ratio(cash holding ratio), firm size, conglomerate as control variable for business performance.