leaders should be young or old? (The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people. But some people think that young people can also be leaders. To that extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?) It seems that from ancient times to the present, of the phenomenon that seniors are usually be the chiefs or commander of administration is common. I partly agree with this idea. Time gives seniors more practical experience accumulation and wisdom that can be learnt no other way. They are acquainted with devastating and urgent situations and events, helping to deal with them more appropriately, which is thought to be at the core of leadership and organizing. Normally, old people are high in seniority so that they are capable of taking responsibility for everything and every numbers. As a result they are considered to be reliable and trustworthy, and giving others mental security. On the other hand, youth is treasure, after all, Youngsters are way more energetic, active and creative that seniors, for they can work extra hours, always hold the passion and are more likely to come up with innovative initiatives, which increase working efficiency a lot. Being leaders is also a fast and effective way to help them learn, improve and thoughen themselves, because they have to plan ahead and be in charge of everything. And not often but there really is some young people with outstanding abilities can work even better than seniors. They shouldn’t be stifled. In conclusion, to a great extent, it is truly reasonable to let the old organize and command. Yet they should also discover and cultivate youngsters of excellent abilities by allowing them to be members of the leading group.

dangerous sports (Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned,while others think that people should have the freedom to choose the sports activities that they want to do. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.) Today, extreme sports have gained phenomenal popularity among people from all over the world, especially youngsters, which spark a wide controversy whether it should be banned or not. Personal safety is one of the most important reasons why some people advocate to restrict dangerous sports. It is quite true that a part of extreme sports, such as bungee jumping, can raise your potential rate to have heart disease, high blood pressure or something. Therefore, governments may be thought to be responsible for their people’s healthcare by declaring the ban on it. Also, extreme sports are widely considered as a waste of money, for the sports lovers have to buy some necessary and reliable outfits and equipment which are of pretty high price. People can even be in debt if they are totally addicted to them. It is definitely probable since the sports fans are mainly the young, most of which do not have abundant funds. On the other hand, extreme sports are likely to be useful and practical for people who are dedicated to join the army and be special soldiers. Because they are great challenges to toughen people’s brave, courage, flexibility, strength and adjustment, which are valuable characters for a qualified soldier. Another advantage is that it is great fun. People can completely release themselves and immerse themselves in the sense stimuli in order to make them feel alive and hectic again, particularly for people who are under great pressure or find their job tedious and dull. This may be an effective way to help them adapt to this fast- paced society. In conclusion, it is apparent that both advantages and disadvantages exist whether the extreme sports are banned or not. In my point of views, it should be individuals’ very freedom to choose their sports way, yet governments offer relational guidance on these issues at the same time.

IELTS Writing Task 2 (Some people think the high sales of products reflect the power of advertising instead of the consumers’ demand. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?) These days, there are many types of advertisements on screens. Some people argue that it is the advertisement that boost the sales of products and encourage people to buy goods unnecessarily. I think these are partly true. Celebrity effort is one of the most remarkable aspect. Popular singers, actors and artists are likely to chosen to advertise goods in return of high paid and even become members in this business. The large number of fans of theirs would buy the products without thinking twice, no matter they need them or not. Also, products on screens usually seem a lot more attractive than they actually are. When people see the new advertisement, they may be eager to try them without consideration, resulting in product sales and consumption that is completely unnecessary. On the other hand, the sales of goods still depend on the consumers’ demand. Considerable consumers exist, anyway. In addition, different consumers have different demands, which leads to sales of different sections. And people’s income should also be considered as well, for they have distinct budget. Luxuries are sold well among the rich, which are not the fundamental need at all but are regarded as the symbols of their wealth and reputation. They attach great importance to keeping up with the trend of fashion, so they may buy the latest wares as long as they see them in others’ hand. As for low income families, although they need the computer very much to search information, sell their goods or something, they have no choice but to borrow it from others or go to the Internet bar, instead of buying one. In conclusion, the advertisement absolutely is one of the reflections of the marketing of products but not all. There are still some other effect including the consumers’ need, spending habits, different budget, etc.