Could you help me check my email, please? Dear Mr. David, I am writing to explain about why I and Ms.Tien did not write the name of Ms. Anh in the assignment #3 report. Firstly, we have a group on Facebook to discuss about the assignment 3, when I and Tien discuss about the questionnaire and how to run regression, Ms. Anh did not write any comments, so only I and Tien do these things. Secondly, Ms. Anh did not take her responsibility. Her writing in the report is a mess, she put the citation in the end of each sentences in her parts. When we ask her to repair her work, she did not reply or do anything, although I said that if she does not repair, I will say to teacher. However, nothing change, so I and Tien must to do again her work. Therefore, we decided to not write her name in the report because we feel that it is unfair with us. Thanks for your consideration! Best regards,

Do you know where I can find my old notebooks last month? Today, I discovered that my notebooks were disappeared. I think that italki refeshes notebook every month, but if I want to read my old notebooks again, do you know where I can find them?

The advantages and disadvantages of studying overseas. Studying abroad has become popular in the world, especially people in developing countries like Vietnam. When the standards of living increase, people tend to improve their knowledge for a better life, so they choose to study in developed countries where they can get progressive education. However , everything has its advantages and disadvantages, so studying abroad is not an exception. It is generally believed that studying overseas brings many benefits. Firstly, most people agree that the quality of education in foreign schools is much better than in domestic schools. In fact, when studying abroad students can have opportunities in order to study new technologies and updated knowledge which may help them find jobs easily after graduation. Furthermore, it is a good chance to learn and improve their foreign languages. Experience shown that learning language with the native speakers is the best way to enhance people's language. On the other hand, studying abroad also has some drawbacks. The main disadvantage is that it is often expensive. It is clear that students not only pay their school tuition, but also pay for their living cost. As a result, finance is the biggest problem which can distract students' mind from their studying to earning money. In addition, adapting to a new environment is a real challenge for every foreign students. For example, the changes of weather may affect students' health and difference culture can influence their mind which can destroy their confidence or even to be a victim of discrimination. Consequently, if students do not have enough physical and mental strength, studying overseas can become their nightmare. In conclusion, the negative effects seem to outweigh the positives. Therefore, people must to think carefully before deciding to study abroad.

why people spend more time on work than on their family. TOPIC: More and more people are busy with work and do not have enough time to spend with their families and friends. Why does it happen? What are the effects on the family and society as a whole? In modern society, people tend to use all their time for work rather than keep in touch with their families and friends. This issue has become popular because of various reasons such as the development of materialism and the indifference to familiars, so it brings not only the negative effects on the family, but also the harmful impacts on the society. There are several reasons that explain why people prefer to work than meet their families and friends. One of the main reasons is the increasing dramatically of materialism. Nowadays, people have a tendency to consider material possessions and physical comfort as more important than spiritual values. As a result, money and position are played as a main role in many people's life, so they decide to work as much as they can to earn money and promote in their job, which means that they do not have enough time to pay for families and friends. The second reason is that people become indifference to something that they think it has already belonged to them, particularly their family. Hence, they just want to pursue a career and do not concern about their family members. However, everything can be lost although that is our parents, and people just realize something which is important with them until they lost it. Those reasons create some serious effects on both family and society.

Who should pay money to expand the road systems essay TOPIC: The number of cars keeps increasing, and road systems should be expanded. Some people think that the government should cover all the costs. Others believe the users should pay for it. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Having a car has become popular in many countries, not only the developed countries like America, but also the developing countries as Vietnam. The number of cars increases dramatically day by day, which put a huge pressure on the government to expand the road systems. However, it is a debate when some people insist that the government should bear all the cost, while others argue that drivers and car owners should take this responsibility. On one hand, there are several reasons for those supported that the government should cover all the costs. Initially, it is clear that the government collect money from taxpayers in order to develop country and serve the community, so some basic infrastructures like road is an indispensable part. Furthermore, it is true that expanding road systems is the best way to promote the economic development. Experiment shows that in Vietnam if a village connect with other places like a mega city by a high quality road , it will become grow quickly because people can exchange their products easily to make profit. On the other hand, those think that the users should bear the costs of upgrade roads have their own arguments. Firstly, the main reason is that if the drivers take the obligation to contribute the roads, it will increase their awareness to maintain the quality of the road, because they may think it is belong to them, so they may drive more careful. The second reason is that it is unfair when they must to pay the same tax to expand the roads, although they are neither driving nor owned car. Hence, they believe that the users should take this responsibility. In conclusion, both views have pros and cons, so it is difficult to say which is better. In my opinion, we should hand in hand to solve this issue, the government should take the main role to upgrade the road systems and the users should pay more tax like road fee as well as do not carry overload to conserve the roads.

Education essay TOPIC: In some countries ( where there is high unemployment) most pupils should be offered only primary education; there is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extend do you agree or disagree? In the modern life, many countries suffer from the increasing of the unemployment rate. Some insist that offering primary education is enough to students who lack the abilities to seek for a job in the future. However, I strongly disagree with this view because it is unfair and unreasonable to make such a perfunctory statement. Firstly, the purpose of studying is not only finding an occupation, but it is a long process to develop people's knowledge and awareness about everything around them. In fact, only primary education is not enough for children to grow up comprehensively. If the aim of their life is just earning money, they may become thief or robber because they lack of knowledge to decide the right and wrong things. Moreover, it is no evidens to show who can or cannot find job in the future, so it is unfair when stop others study because of uncertainly recognition. In fact, people who graduated primary school are just children( around 10 to 12 years old), so I cannot image that they should find a job at this age, and in Vietnam people must to have high school certification if they want to be a worker. In conclusion, pupils should be encouraged to be provided a higher education which may help them comprehensive themselves and contribute more to the society.

Crime essay TOPIC: Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give a longer prison sentence. Others, however, think there are better alternatives to reduce crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion. In the morden life, many countries suffer from the increasing level of crimes. This brings a breed of fear to the innocent civilians, which leads them demand stronger punishments to stop this trend. Some people insist that longer prison sentence is the best solution to tackle this problem; while, others believe that alternative ways are more effecient to reduce crime. In this essay, I will investigate both views and give my own opinion. There are many benefits of using longer jail sentence for offenders. The main advantage is that the longer the criminals who committed serious damages to others such as rob, violence, child rape and murder are separated from the community; the higher the chances of the innocence being safe increase dramatically. During the long prison period, the offendes can rehabitated their mind by living under the confined and educated of wardens. As a result, they might change their behaviour and awareness to become better. On the other hand, others argue that reducing crime by alternative ways is more effecient have their own reasons. They believe that keeping the criminals in jail for a long period after damaged one's life is wasting tax which they paid. Moreover, the stronger penalty like capital punishment is a strict warning to prevent people do something wrong, as a results, the rate of crime might reduce. In addition, I think that prisoners are a good labour resource, so they should service whole the community under supervision as a great way to atone for their mistakes during their imprisonment. For example, they can work as a worker in steal factory or as a farmer to harvest crops in the field. In conclusion, both views have their own evidens, so it is difficult to say which is better. In my opinion, we should cooparete both ideas, because different people have different level of crime, so the judge must base on their situation to sentence punishment

IELTS essay task2 . Please help me correct it. Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? Many young people are offering for do charity works, which can be beneficial for both individual and society as whole. However, I personally disagree that we forced them to do these works. It is obvious that most teenagers have had under enough pressure in their life, without doing any works in their spare time. School is as a full time job, where students must to study approximately 8 hours per day. Moreover, they are not only need to pay all their attention in class, but also have to do a lot of homework; and preparing carefully for numerous tests and exams. Therefore, when they have free time, they should be encouraged to spend time with friends and relax, instead of doing any jobs, which they have many years ahead for work in their lifetime. Additionally, I do not believe that asking young people to do unpaid work can bring more efficient on the community. Moreover, it is unfair and against the meaning of charity when the group of people as teenagers must to do something that they do not want to do. In fact, they may feel that they are milked, which can lead to resentment amongst young people and bring some negative consequences such as hate charity work or even anti-society. In conclusion, teenagers could do some volunteer works to help others, but my opinion is that this work should not be compulsory.

I'm going to take IELTS exam next week. So please help me improve my Writing skills, it's so bad T.T Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Education for children has become a great concern of many countries in the world recently. Some people think that teaching foreign language for children should be start at an early ages like 5 to 12 years old is much better than start at an older ages. Although this view has some positive points, it also has some negative effects. There are several benefits of learning foreign language at primary school. Firstly, pupils who studying at primary schools will learn language much faster than those learning at the older ages. Experience shows that at this age, children are curious everything around them, they want to try and learn some new things so this is a good period to study new languages. Secondly, learning languages is a long process which students should study and practice day by day, thus if they begin to study early, they will learn more. Last but not least, studying foreign languages is a best way of brain training which will help children more intelligent. On the other hand, one of the most important disadvantages is children can be bad at their mother language. For example, in Vietnam some children do not know how to describe something in Vietnamese, because their parents force them to just study in English. Moreover, students can be confuse about grammar when they write. In conclusion, the positive points outweigh the negative points. Students should learn other languages early to prepare for their future.