大家是为什么要学习中文呢？ 学习中文过程中有什么地方感到困难吗？

Difference between へ and に Which one is correct? そこを左に曲ってください そこを左へ曲ってください

ぼくの一日 今朝、朝ごはんを食べてから、同学たちと通訳宿題について相談した。それから、少し眠かったから、もう一時間寝た。そして、友達とレストランで昼ご飯を食べて、バイトのところへ面接に行った。面接を合格した後で、家に帰って、晩ご飯を食べた、それから、川沿いに音楽を聴いて散歩した。

Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past It is hard to deny that technology broadens children's horizons, and such a statement leads impressionable people to generate the idea that technology has made children more creative than before. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies and should be examined meticulously. As far as learning patterns, time proportion, mass information are concerned, I strongly hold the belief that technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. First and foremost, technology has made children unwilling to think, as it has changed their learning patterns. With numerous resources and information on the Internet, kids would resort to the Internet when questions emerge, instead of thinking by themselves. In a long term, they would be deprived of the ability to think independently and logically, which would harms their creativity. By contrast, in the past, as kids had no access to the Internet, they had to use their own minds to think of solutions to problems. Their creativity could be developed as they spared no effort to find the final answer. Second, the fact that children spend too much time on technological products indicates that their creavitity might be influenced. This is because they would have less time to spend on other meaningful activities if they spend most of their time on surfing the Internet, playing video games, or chatting with friends online. Take the example of Charles Darwin, who spent almost all his childhood observing plants and insects. His exposure to the nature when he was young sharpened his mind and paved the way for his future success. His famous book, The Origin of Species, greatly shows his creativity, which came from his invaluable experience during his childhood. A voice arises that technology offers children great chances to get connected with the outside world. Ironically, it is easy for children to be lost in the sea of information. Since young children have not formed the ability to distinguish useful information from useless information, they might be easily overwhelmed by the innumerous useless information on the Internet. This would do nothing but harm children's creativity. Besides, it is not uncommon for children to come across false information on the Internet. Since they are also not capable of determining the truthfulness of infromation, they could be easily misled by fake information, which is also bad for the development of their creativity.

Writing practice 5.28 The written part mentions three possible hypothesis concerning the use of great houses in Chaco Canyon. However, the professor uses evidence and reasons to cast doubt on each hypothesis. The first hypothesis made by the article is that the houses could be used as residential areas. Supporters of this theory states that the great houses are similar to apartment buildings in later times. Nonetheless, the professor argues that though the houses look like residential areas from the outside, the inside of these houses does not show any trace of living areas. According to the professor, if there were hurdreds of families living here, there should have been many fire places. However, even in the biggest house which contains rooms for one hurdred families, there are only fire places for ten families. The second hypothesis in the article is that the houses might be used as places for food storage. Again, this is challenged by the professor. The professor maintains that if the houses were used for storing grains, there should have been traces of maize and food containers. However, no study shows that there is any trace of maize or containers. As a result, the second hypothesis might undergo criticism. Thirdly, the article comes up with the hypothesis that the houses might be ceremonial centers since lots of old materials and broken pots are found in them. Nevertheless, the professor mentions that other materials are also found in the same area, such as sand and stones. These houses, the professor states, might be used as trash pots to place used construction materials. And according to the professor, the broken pots, were likely to be used to cook meals for the construction workers.

Could you help me correct my essay？ The written part mentions the disadvantages of online encyclopedias when they are compared to traditional encyclopedias. Nonetheless, the professor uses reasons and details to cast doubt on the points mentioned in the article. First, as it is mentioned in the passage, there are many errors in online encyclopedias, which make them inaccurate and unreliable. However, the professor holds that every encyclopedia has errors in it, and it it impossible to find an encyclopedia, no matter printed or online, without any error. Furthermore, the professor says, errors in online encyclopedias could be corrected soon, while errors in traditional encyclopedias might exist for decades. Second, the passage maintains that online encyclopedias are vulnerable to hackers and the information might be fabricated, deleted, or corrupted. Again, this is refuted by the lecturer. The lecturer mentions two ways that have been used to prevent hackering from happening. One is to include crucial information in a format so nobody could change it. Another is to hire editors to monitor any change on the content. As a result, the lecturer mentions, it is rather hard for hackers to disturb the information. Third, the article points out that online encyclopedias put too much emphasis on trivial topics, which might lead the users to generate false ideas of what is really significant. However, the professor states that compared to traditional encyclopedias which have to decide what is important, online encyclopedias are not limited to the space. Though online encyclopedias consist of various topics, they do not omit any academic content. Furthermore, according to the lecturer, diversity of content is one of the biggest advantages of online encyclopedias.

TOEFL: Teachers were more respected and valued by the society in the past It is hard to deny that nowadays people have attached greater importance to education and such a fact leads impressionable people to generate the idea that teachers are more valued and appreciated than ten years before. However, this statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies and should be examined meticulously. As far as the concept of a teacher, technology and social expectation are considered, I strongly hold that teachers were more respected in the past. First, teachers are not so respected by society as before, as the concept of teacher has been expanded. In the past, only those who taught knowledge to students at school could be called teachers. Nonetheless, the concept of teacher has been expanded with the development of society. Nowadays, people including counselors in teaching corporations, crafters in art galleries, even barbers in barber shops can be called teachers. The expansion of the concept might lead people to think that not every teacher qualifies the name of teacher. Second, the fact that students could have easier access to good teachers indicates that ordinary teachers might not be valued as before. Take the case of MOOC, an online teaching platform which congregates sorts of excellent courses in top universities all around the world. By only sitting in front of their computers, students could have access to various courses taught by outstanding teachers. Meanwhile, compared to these outstanding teachers, normal teachers might be less attractive and popular. In this way, students might disrespect their teachers at school and resort to online courses taught by famous teachers. Nevertheless, a voice arises that the modern society has put greater emphasis on the significance of education. According to this statement, since education has been greatly valued, teachers should be much more respected than before. Ironically, compared to the past, people have much higher expectation on current teachers to fulfill their needs. If teachers cannot reach their expectation, they might get disappointed and might not respect teachers any longer. In a nutshell, as far as the concept of a teacher, technology and social expectations are put into consideration, I maintain that currently, teachers are not given enough respect than ten years ago.

広がる　広まる 広がる　と　広まる 違う点は何ですか。