ๆๅฐ่ช ่ฑ่ช {1} ๆๅธซโฆโฆ
Farhana Qureishi
Could anyone please explain which one is the correct option for the part in bold here?
โช In 1923, ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐บ๐๐บ ๐๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ถ๐น๐ฑ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ผ๐น๐๐บ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ฎ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ป๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐๐ถ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ruling that it was a form of price-fixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract.
(A) the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional, and
(B) the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia, and
(C) the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia,
(D) a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court,
(E) when the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional,
2023ๅนด11ๆ18ๆฅ 23:06
่งฃ็ญ ยท 3
C is the only possible correct answer.
This is tricky because it is a long phrase that is being substituted and it is difficult to keep the entire sentence in one's head.
If we shorten it a bit, it is clearer, I think.
(C) becomes then "The Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage, ruling that it was a form of price-fixing.
The other options are either incomplete sentences (E) or only work if we change "ruling" to "ruled" (A and B) or require us to rearrange the sentence (D).
This question takes some very careful reading!
2023ๅนด11ๆ19ๆฅ
Hi. Iโm a native English speaker and a lawyer. While each of the statements is reasonable, each can be improved. If you must choose from these, โDโ is best.
One problem is the word โdeclared.โ Better choices would be โstruck downโ or โruled,โ because the Supreme Court doesnโt really make declarations. It decides if a law is constitutional or not.
A smaller problem is that the phrase โminimum wageโ is incomplete here. A better choice might be โminimum wage lawโ. A minimum wage is a concept; the Supreme Court didnโt reject the concept, per se. It rejected a DC law establishing a minimum wage for women (or more precisely, establishing a board to oversee minimum allowed wages).
Consider his alternative:
โIn 1923, the Supreme Court struck down a District of Columbia law mandating minimum wage requirements for women. The court ruled that the law unconstitutionally infringed upon the rights of employers and employees to contract on their own terms, as protected by the Fifth Amendment.โ
I hope this helps.
2023ๅนด11ๆ19ๆฅ
A, B, C, and D are all correct. What a strange question! Actually, all of them are technically wrong. It was the law establishing the minimum wage that was declared unconstitutional, if you want to get picky. The Supreme Court cannot issue proclamations about what should or should not be. That would be a law. Only Congress can make laws.
2023ๅนด11ๆ18ๆฅ
้ๆฒๆพๅฐไฝ ่ฆ็็ญๆกๅ๏ผ
ๅฏซไธไฝ ็ๅ้ก๏ผ่ฎๆฏ่ช่
ไพๅนซๅฉไฝ ๏ผ
Farhana Qureishi
่ช่จ่ฝๅ
ๅญๅ ๆ่ช, ่ฑ่ช
ๅญธ็ฟ่ช่จ
่ฑ่ช
ไฝ ไน่จฑๆๅๆญก็ๆ็ซ

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
12 ่ฎ ยท 11 ็่จ

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When Youโre Nervous)
13 ่ฎ ยท 11 ็่จ

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
11 ่ฎ ยท 6 ็่จ
ๆดๅคๆ็ซ