ๆœๅฐ‹่‡ช ่‹ฑ่ชž {1} ๆ•™ๅธซโ€ฆโ€ฆ
Farhana Qureishi
Could anyone please explain which one is the correct option for the part in bold here? โ–ช In 1923, ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—บ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐——๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—น๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ruling that it was a form of price-fixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract. (A) the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional, and (B) the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia, and (C) the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia, (D) a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, (E) when the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional,
2023ๅนด11ๆœˆ18ๆ—ฅ 23:06
่งฃ็ญ” ยท 3
C is the only possible correct answer. This is tricky because it is a long phrase that is being substituted and it is difficult to keep the entire sentence in one's head. If we shorten it a bit, it is clearer, I think. (C) becomes then "The Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage, ruling that it was a form of price-fixing. The other options are either incomplete sentences (E) or only work if we change "ruling" to "ruled" (A and B) or require us to rearrange the sentence (D). This question takes some very careful reading!
2023ๅนด11ๆœˆ19ๆ—ฅ
Hi. Iโ€™m a native English speaker and a lawyer. While each of the statements is reasonable, each can be improved. If you must choose from these, โ€œDโ€ is best. One problem is the word โ€œdeclared.โ€ Better choices would be โ€œstruck downโ€ or โ€œruled,โ€ because the Supreme Court doesnโ€™t really make declarations. It decides if a law is constitutional or not. A smaller problem is that the phrase โ€œminimum wageโ€ is incomplete here. A better choice might be โ€œminimum wage lawโ€. A minimum wage is a concept; the Supreme Court didnโ€™t reject the concept, per se. It rejected a DC law establishing a minimum wage for women (or more precisely, establishing a board to oversee minimum allowed wages). Consider his alternative: โ€œIn 1923, the Supreme Court struck down a District of Columbia law mandating minimum wage requirements for women. The court ruled that the law unconstitutionally infringed upon the rights of employers and employees to contract on their own terms, as protected by the Fifth Amendment.โ€ I hope this helps.
2023ๅนด11ๆœˆ19ๆ—ฅ
A, B, C, and D are all correct. What a strange question! Actually, all of them are technically wrong. It was the law establishing the minimum wage that was declared unconstitutional, if you want to get picky. The Supreme Court cannot issue proclamations about what should or should not be. That would be a law. Only Congress can make laws.
2023ๅนด11ๆœˆ18ๆ—ฅ
้‚„ๆฒ’ๆ‰พๅˆฐไฝ ่ฆ็š„็ญ”ๆกˆๅ—Ž๏ผŸ
ๅฏซไธ‹ไฝ ็š„ๅ•้กŒ๏ผŒ่ฎ“ๆฏ่ชž่€…ไพ†ๅนซๅŠฉไฝ ๏ผ