搜尋自 英語 {1} 教師……
GotoBrazil
Why to use "read" rather than "readS"? “Mao must be portrayed as great and glorious. He must not be besmirched,” read one popular comment.
2021年7月11日 15:57
解答 · 9
2
It is using “read” as the past tense of read. It seems that the comment was already posted so the author used the past tense. you can say, “Mao must be portrayed as great and glorious. He must not be besmirched,” reads one popular comment. which means the same thing but in the present. .
2021年7月11日
2
It sounds like this is in the passive voice. Read (pronounced “reed”) becomes read (pronounced “red”) in the passive voice. Hope that helps!
2021年7月11日
1
This is a good question. Asad''s example is correct. The problem is that we spell the word "read" the same, even when we pronounce it differently. You could say it in 2 ways: Reads = (pronounced like reeeeeeeeeeeeeeds" )puts it in the present. Read = ( pronounced like "red") puts it in the past. Either one makes sense. Our spelling system can be confusing sometimes.
2021年7月11日
1
It's similar to reported speech, so you're telling me about something someone else said, so it is in the past tense. ReadS is a present tense form.
2021年7月11日
你好,有唔有興趣一齊學習英文?我想搵個夥伴齊齊學習
2021年7月13日
還沒找到你要的答案嗎?
寫下你的問題,讓母語者來幫助你!

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!