Yes, those who own little are more generous than wealthy ones. This is very noticeable in most communities.

Some say that these wealths wouldn’t have be collected without their stinginess and greed. While in reality happiness and richness lie in giving and helping others.

Amazing topic Florian as usual.

@Dave To answer what you said, : That last one may be finally fixed here now, but I just don't get why somebody's generosity should matter so much."

@Ariana Zialcita  I love your answer.

Wealth is amoral though it brings out the real personality of a person (same as lack). I know a lot of rich people who are stingy because they fear losing money and they are into their own security. Being rich doesn't make you stingy- being fearful does because all you care about is your own security and comfort. There's nothing wrong with that but realistically, your life would be empty if all you do is to hang onto your resources because one day, you could lose them, and how would you handle it if for instance, a pandemic or recession would wipe away your wealth?

On the other hand, I know rich people who are very generous and dislike 'cheap' people. They use their wealth to bless others and believe me, you will never become poor by being generous but you could become poor by becoming stingy

Eh, maybe I don't know enough rich people, but who says all people who spend like that are in fact rich, though. Maybe they're just highly leveraged in debt because they can get a car loan, or they're spending all their earnings instead of having any long term savings or investments. Or some other unsustainable way of living if things suddenly go south.

If somebody wanted to wear a cheap watch, so be it? Even millionaire professional athletes can wind up in the poor house eventually because they don't know how to manage their own finances properly.

Maybe there should also be easier ways for people to get ahead? Easier to incorporate or take the independent entrepreneurial route without getting saddled with expensive fixed health insurance rates that don't make any sense until you can turn a higher profit. That last one may be finally fixed here now, but I just don't get why somebody's generosity should matter so much.

It's human nature to want to have some control over how you're giving things away or not. Here you can donate 1% of your income tax to a qualified charity. Maybe the government accounts for that in some other way with tax write-offs, but it's a huge thing here. Around tax season you see all these billboards and other ads competing for your 1%. Maybe the administrative overhead isn't ideal, but you can also often donate to individual causes directly.