搜索 英語 老師
Danyel
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе...
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
&
Thе cakе would havе been burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
What is the difference?
2017年4月29日 09:35
解答 · 2
1
As Micahel helpfully explains, "the cake would have burnt" is referring to the action of the cake burning, whereas "the cake would have been burnt" refers to the final result - a burnt cake!
---
Want to learn English the SMART (Stretch, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely) way with me? Go to my teacher profile and book your $1 trial lesson now!
http://bit.ly/paulblakemanitalkiteacher
2017年4月29日
1
to be burnt - burnt is a past participle which is being used as an adjective to describe the state of the cake.
to burn - verb to describe the activity in this case within itself (the cake); there is no direct object
There is no significant difference in meaning in this case.
2017年4月29日
還沒找到你要的答案嗎?
寫下你的問題,讓母語者來幫助你!
Danyel
語言能力
白俄羅斯語, 英語, 法語, 波蘭語, 俄語, 烏克蘭語
學習語言
英語, 波蘭語
你也許會喜歡的文章

Speak More Fluently with This Simple Technique
14 讚 · 2 留言

How to Read and Understand a Business Contract in English
16 讚 · 3 留言

6 Ways italki Can Help You Succeed in Your School Language Classes
12 讚 · 7 留言
更多文章