Mike

It was a wonderful lesson! Mike is a super-professional English teacher. He not only explains well but also feels when the student finds it difficult to answer and selects simpler words and expressions. Thanks a lot to Mike for your patience and your time! Sincerely, your student, Sergio! I recommend this teacher to everyone! Это был замечательный урок! Майк сверх-профессионалный учитель английского. Он не только хорошо объясняет, но и прекрасно чувствует когда ученик затрудняется ответить и подбирает более простые слова и выражения. Большое спасибо Майк за терпение и за Ваше время! С глубоким уважением, ваш ученик, Серджио! Рекомендую всем данного преподавателя!

It's really enjoyable talking with you and sharing with you some of my experience, you are absolutely a devoted teacher who helps me with my English speaking!, Thank you so much for your effort in our session.

Nationalization is a nightmare for conservatives. As Ronald Reagan consistently believed, "Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." This conviction is very much in the tradition of the Tories. Winston Churchill once criticized the inefficiency of state-led social redistribution policies, summarizing his view with the famous analogy: "It is like dipping a hand into one person's pocket to put money into another's, and inevitably, some of the money falls on the ground, so waste is inevitable." In Churchill's eyes, the state was like that restless hand, always wanting to intervene in politics, society, and the economy in an attempt to do good, but often only succeeding in making things worse.

Mike is a great teacher. I enjoy every class with Mike. He is helpful and supportive. If you want to improve your writing skills, Mike is the best teacher who can help you reach a goal.

When Lord Acton stated, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely," he did not specify that this phenomenon is necessarily confined to any particular political system. Power exists within every political framework; it is just that some systems possess a stronger inclination toward the separation of powers. Yet, is such an inclination inherently permanent? When leaders in democratic nations begin to suppress freedom of speech, openly vilify political rivals, and shift all blame onto their opponents, is it possible that, in the long run, the "arc of history" might shift its trajectory, leading these nations away from the democracy they once knew?

People who have received higher education know that the odds in a casino are always stacked against the gambler—this is the foundation of their profitability. Yet, even armed with this undeniable fact, gamblers remain enthusiastic. What they pursue is the uncertainty that transcends this certainty—the possibility that they might still win, even though the probability is mathematically very low. If someone were willing to give you a complete life script, telling you everything that would happen for the rest of your life, would you accept it? I suspect most people would not, and those who did accept would quickly regret it, because from that point on, their lives would be dominated solely by certainty.To some extent, this is also the reason why populists are willing to vote for their leaders: even when they know that the leader's actions might harm their interests, all they truly desire is change, regardless of whether it is for the better or for the worse.