I came across an online report about "The Golden Method About Walking To Prevent Illness" and would like to summarize and share some of the interesting points here. The method is to walk 8000 steps per day and 20-minute brisk walking of them can prevent every illness. This is reported by the research team at Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital which has traced and observed for 20 years on how much effect on illness prevention depending on how many steps you walk per day and how long you walk fast during your walking. It is called "the miracle research" or "the golden method of walking". The result has been going viral on social network in Japan. The result showed walking 8000 steps every day and walking fast for 20 minutes at that time declined the risk of lifestyle diseases by one tenth. 9 of 10 people exercising in this way are doing well. On the other hand, in the case of people who have walked below 2000 steps per day, they have tendency to be bedridden when they get old. In the case of 4000 steps walking a day and 5-minute fast walking, they have an effect on depression prevention. In the case of 7000 steps and 15-minute fast walking, they have an effect on cancer prevention such as colon cancer. The team says that fall is the perfect season for walking and evening is the best time for that. If you want to walk in the morning, you should start waking an hour later after waking up. I think I'm going to alter my lifestyle tomorrow.

What does hang out mean?

Being able to talk on a wide variety of topics is really helpful for getting a higher mark on the IELTS test. In this podcast I will help you to form opinions and ideas for Speaking Part 3 and Writing Part 2. You can also book a private lesson with me on my profile. Hope to see you in a lesson soon!

A Quitter never win and a winner never qutts

Instead of acknowledging at least some of these excellent achievements — even if only the skilled use of many grammatical elements, such as nominalised participles (e.g., Studierende), or linguistic elements like fixed word combinations — he indulged in nitpicking. The candidate supposedly had “problems with pronunciation”: the R, yes, the R, he proclaimed: “For that, you need 10–12 years to get a German R right... And I’m talking about just a normal R, not the rolled R… or the umlauts, for example... that’s torture for an Asian... and you think after 2 years as a native Vietnamese you’ll get that?” To put it in a nutshell: Vietnamese pronunciation is objectively far more complex than German’s. Vietnamese is a tonal language — a single syllable can have six different meanings depending on pitch and contour. Misplace the tone, and you are suddenly saying something entirely different. German, by contrast, is actually pretty straightforward: no tones, no pitch-determined meaning. Once you've got the ch, the umlauts, the R, they stay put. So while a Vietnamese learner might struggle with the R, a German speaker trying to master Vietnamese tones is in for a far rougher ride. The fact that — contrary to the examiner’s claim — the candidate had no problem with the R whatsoever makes me wonder whether his perception was less about reality and more about bias-driven projection. Had the colleague acted in good faith, i.e., in a way that aligns with the examiner’s role of embodying tacit professional norms and being sensitive to the pressure on the candidate, he might have helped create a fair, safe, supportive, yet evaluative environment. Such an approach and mindset would not only have a positive and motivating effect on the student but, surprise, surprise, on the examiner himself as well.

My dad his someone how I don’t have many things to describe him, but his my super hero. His help me to be calm in many situations, so thankful is for mister “Hehuka”

Does anyone else absolutely hate the new italki app user interface? I want to be very clear, I do.

The company decided to ____ the new project because it was too expensive. a) start b) create c) cancel d) design

Can “august” imply commanding dominance, as in Augustus Caesar? And to what extent is a word’s nuanced meaning in context subject to personal interpretation? The verdict was delivered by an august tribunal, whose wisdom was unquestioned.

2/3 Contrary to his judgment, the Vietnamese student was not attempting to “force something” she was incapable of doing. Instead, she spontaneously expressed her thoughts — shaped by her two academic subjects — without being excessively hindered by a language barrier. Grammatically, she used nearly perfect inflexion, employed linguistic tools such as complements, infinitive constructions, and a wide range of connectors, and was fully capable of speaking spontaneously and appropriately about complex topics with highly suitable vocabulary. The second candidate’s question, about a negative experience in Germany, was difficult to answer — especially since the student from Vietnam demonstrated a reflective, mature approach to experiences in general, whether positive or negative. She not only addressed the content of the question but did so in a culturally sensitive (!) and socially intelligent way: she framed the negative experience in terms of her self-perception of her own German language skills. What could more clearly demonstrate an excellent command of language than the ability to express both intercultural tact and a complex personal life situation in an entirely appropriate and comprehensible manner?