Wählen Sie aus verschiedenen Englisch Lehrkräften für ...
Ryota
I've learned that after subordinate conjunctions a subject can be omitted when the subject matches the one in the main clause.
I recognize “than” as a subordinate conjunction, but in the subordinate clause in the sentence below it is ‘land and water’ that is omitted. Not ‘they’. Why is that possible?
“Plant-based meats have been gaining popularity. One U.S. company is using mushroom root to make its
products. They use less land and water than is needed to raise animal meat and produce, which in turn lowers greenhouse gas emissions.”
17. Dez. 2023 13:11
Antworten · 4
The subjects do not match. Also, "than" is used as a preposition in your sentence, not a conjunction. "Than" is used to introduce the second element in a comparison. The word "is" superfluous, plays no role, and you can omit it: "less land and water than needed". The subordinate clause has no subject and no verb.
17. Dezember 2023
You've got the right idea. To replace all the words that have been omitted for the sake of brevity would make the sentence repetitive and overly wordy:
They use less land and water than the amount of land and water that is needed to raise animal meat and produce, which in turn lowers greenhouse gas emissions.”
17. Dezember 2023
Haben Sie noch keine Antworten gefunden?
Geben Sie Ihre Fragen ein und lassen Sie sich von Muttersprachlern helfen!
Ryota
Sprachfähigkeiten
Englisch, Japanisch
Lernsprache
Englisch
Artikel, die Ihnen gefallen könnten

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
10 positive Bewertungen · 7 Kommentare

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
12 positive Bewertungen · 9 Kommentare

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
9 positive Bewertungen · 2 Kommentare
Weitere Artikel