Do you agree that schools are not necessary because students can get information from the Internet? It is true that students can easily get access to a variety of online resources nowadays. However,I do not agree with the claim that nternet can be substitute for schools for several reasons. Firstly, schools play an important role in urging students,especially lower-grade students. Advanced technology has made it possible to learn all kinds of courses on the internet. Like tradtional classes in the school, many online courses require students to finish assignments and take the final exam. As for those procrastinators who flee the restrictions of schools, finishing studying tasks on time seems quite stuggling. After all, A student can be motivated by hard-working classmates and urged by teacher in school, even if he lacks self-discipline.Some people may claim that students can be urged by their parents at home. It is unpractical for busy parents to stay along with their children all the time and monitor whether they are studying or not. Secondly, The large amount of online information will confuse students who do not have the ability to tell which information is valuable.In contrast, well-experiened teachers in school know what materials to choose and will always offer structured courses to students. Last but not least, schools not only teach academic knowledge but also teach many other useful skills like how to cooperate with others, how to get along with peers and most impornt, how to be an upright person. These skills cannot be learnt on the internet for they can only be gained by practice. To sum up,internet can be a possible way to access knowledge, but it can never take the place of schools.