Wählen Sie aus verschiedenen Englisch Lehrkräften für ...
italki378720
Hi
Can you help me?
I have a question. Which one is correct or more natural?
1. I had a spell at ABC Company for 3 years ago.
2. I worked at ABC Company for 3 years ago.
Thanks in advance
22. Apr. 2022 07:58
Antworten · 7
The comment below is incorrect. You can, "Work there for a spell," but usage of this might be regional. As an Australian English speaker, I would understand it, and I would suppose native UK speakers would to. But that doesn't mean it's the best option.
Neither sentence really strikes me as particularly natural. For example, you can say:
I had/worked a spell at ABC three years ago.
I worked at ABC until three years ago (or just I worked at ABC three years ago).
I would probably go with one of those last two. Using "for" is incorrect.
If you opt for 'spell', I'd suggest using this in less formal contexts and for more throwaway conversation. "Oh, I worked there for a spell too a couple of years back." It's not as great a response to an employer's questioning, however.
Hope this help.
22. April 2022
Using "a spell" to mean a period of time is correct but rather colloquial and 'folksy'. For most normal usage you're probably better off using no. 2. If you want to say for a period of time 'a while' is more standard.
23. April 2022
Number 2, definitely.
Spell means spelling words or a kind of magic. It has no meaning in such a context.
22. April 2022
Haben Sie noch keine Antworten gefunden?
Geben Sie Ihre Fragen ein und lassen Sie sich von Muttersprachlern helfen!
italki378720
Sprachfähigkeiten
Englisch, Thailändisch
Lernsprache
Englisch
Artikel, die Ihnen gefallen könnten

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
9 positive Bewertungen · 7 Kommentare

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
12 positive Bewertungen · 9 Kommentare

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
7 positive Bewertungen · 2 Kommentare
Weitere Artikel