Wählen Sie aus verschiedenen Englisch Lehrkräften für ...
Meng
Should there be an “apostrophe-s” following “of somebody”?
There’s a problem that always puzzles me.
Examples of the problem goes like:
“……, you should have made more of the fact that Sandy’s payout to this cause is more than double that of Amy’s, ……”
In this case we put an apostrophe-s after “of Amy”
whilst another sentence goes:
“……, in terms of dietary expenditure, John had the greatest cost of it at $1000 per day, a figure which dwarfed the one of Jamie, ……”
Now we have no apostrophe-s after “of Jamie”
Can anyone explain the reason for such a discrepancy please ?
30. Okt. 2012 14:44
Antworten · 2
1
In the first example, the "possession" (grammatically speaking) is omitted. (i.e. you could say "...more than double that of Amy's PAYOUT). Although omitted, the structure is the same.
The second example does not use the same format. It uses the "of" form of possession - "one" is the subject of possession, followed by "of" and the possessor "Jamie". In this case, no apostrophe-s is used.
I think the confusion is from how "that" looks like a possession - it isn't. I can't say "I like Edward's that." But I can say "I like Edward's one." (of course, you must previously state what "one" this is - through context or through explanation.
Hope that helps!
30. Oktober 2012
Haben Sie noch keine Antworten gefunden?
Geben Sie Ihre Fragen ein und lassen Sie sich von Muttersprachlern helfen!
Meng
Sprachfähigkeiten
Chinesisch (Mandarin), Chinesisch (Taiwanesisch), Englisch, Spanisch
Lernsprache
Englisch, Spanisch
Artikel, die Ihnen gefallen könnten

English Vocabulary for Using Microsoft Office at Work
28 positive Bewertungen · 7 Kommentare

How to Answer “How Was Your Weekend?” Naturally in English
56 positive Bewertungen · 30 Kommentare

Why Some Jokes Don’t Translate: Understanding Humor in English
15 positive Bewertungen · 6 Kommentare
Weitere Artikel
