Boubouja
Which tenses do we use to talk about two succesive actions that one happend before the current... Which tenses do we use to talk about two succesive actions that one happend before the current action in present?? which one does sound more natural??? =they didn't have problems before they have today (past simple+present) =they haven't had problems before they have today (present perfect+present)) thanks
3. Mai 2016 19:22
Antworten · 7
1
Which tenses do we use to talk about two consecutive* actions where* one happens* before another in the* present? Which one sounds* more natural? Since you are referring to "today," the word "now" may be used = "They didn't have problems until now." (simple past) If you wish to use the word "today" = "They didn't have problems before today." (simple past) No other verb needs to be used because a timeframe is given (ie. "now," "today"), meaning it is not necessary to create a subordinate clause. A simple, independent clause works just fine. "They haven't had problems before, but now they are (having them)." (present perfect + present [or present progressive]) The words "having them" in parentheses, which is part of the present progressive ("are having") are not required and are usually left out; however, saying them is still correct. Since you are referring to the present (ie. "now," "today"), the present perfect must be used for the first event that occurred in the recent past, while the present should be used for the one that occurs after, in the present moment.
5. Mai 2016
1
This example sentence is incorrect. They haven't had problems until now. There's connection with now so the Present Perfect should be used. E.g., I have finished the task so I can take a break now.
3. Mai 2016
They haven't had problems before today. "they have" la deuxième fois est pas nécessaire.
14. Mai 2016
They didn't have problems in the past, but they do now.
4. Mai 2016
Haben Sie noch keine Antworten gefunden?
Geben Sie Ihre Fragen ein und lassen Sie sich von Muttersprachlern helfen!