[Deleted]
Supposed to VS Suppose to
Sorry again for this stupid grammar question... I don't wanna look up on internet today, I'm too lazy... ٩(๑`^´๑)۶
Are these two sentences grammatically correct?
What am I suppose to tell you?
What was I supposed to tell you?
Please give me some examplezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzz
25. Okt. 2018 11:14
Antworten · 7
3
Hi Snoop,
'What am I suppose to tell you?' is incorrect
The second is correct.
Examples:
What do you suppose Linus did when Snoopy washed his blanket?
Snoopy: 'Linus' blanket was so dirty, what else was I supposed to do - use it on my sofa?
Hope this helps :-)
Martin
25. Oktober 2018
1
'suppose to' doesn't exist
both sentences should be 'supposed to' - the tense is not important
:)
25. Oktober 2018
1
The expression "supposed to", if you want to describe what someone should do, is always spelled "supposed to" and not "suppose to". It always goes with a form of the verb "to be" ("He was supposed to do ...............", or "She's not supposed to do ........").
25. Oktober 2018
Haben Sie noch keine Antworten gefunden?
Geben Sie Ihre Fragen ein und lassen Sie sich von Muttersprachlern helfen!
Artikel, die Ihnen gefallen könnten
Phone and Video Call English: Sounding Confident Remotely
4 positive Bewertungen · 0 Kommentare
How to Handle Difficult Conversations at Work
3 positive Bewertungen · 0 Kommentare
English for Awkward Moments: What to Say When You Don’t Know What to Say
42 positive Bewertungen · 28 Kommentare
Weitere Artikel
