Jay
"Meetings are the time waster there is" vs. "There is a meeting which is the time waster" "Meetings are the biggest time waster there is." It is the sentence I want to understand. I've never seen that 'there is' is put at the end of a sentence. When I saw this sentence, I understood the meaning, but it was weird to me. "Meetings are the biggest time waster there is" vs. "There is a meeting which is the biggest time waster" Do they have the same meaning? And why is 'there is' used in that way? Thank you very much!!
1. Nov. 2019 18:23
Antworten · 3
3
No, the meanings are not the same. In this context, "meetings" ("meeting" in the plural with the zero article) indicates a general category. "Meetings are the biggest time waster there is." = "Meetings AS A CATEGORY are the biggest time waster there is." = "Meetings as a category are the biggest time waster THAT there is." = "Meetings as a category are the biggest time waster THAT EXISTS."
1. November 2019
Thank you so much!! :)
1. November 2019
They don’t have the same meaning, no. “Meetings are the biggest time waster there is” This means meetings are the biggest waste time, in a general sense. “There is a meeting which is the biggest time waster” This means there is a specific meeting which is the biggest time waste.. “There is” is required because “biggest” is a superlative adjective. It compares meetings in general with everything else (in the world)
1. November 2019
Haben Sie noch keine Antworten gefunden?
Geben Sie Ihre Fragen ein und lassen Sie sich von Muttersprachlern helfen!