Jayden
下面这句话是什么意思?But no son of dad's was going to be disabled . What's the meaning of the this sentence--But no son of dad's was going to be disabled. Thanks这里有一道题目是这样问的:What does the underlined sentence in Paragraph 3 suggest? A. The author's father didn't believe that he was disabled. B. The author's father was determined to treat him like a normal child. C. The author's father blamed the doctors for his son's disability. D. The author's father didn't give up vivil he had found solution.
26. Okt. 2010 03:30
Antworten · 8
2
son of dad's = all his brothers Now unless you give me the context I can't explain the rest. But no son of dad's was going to be disabled . In this phrase he is "reporting" the intentions of his father. That is why it is in the past (is going to ... was going to), and the actions of his father follow that sentence making everything clear. It's a very dramatic way of expression the intentions of another person, and I don't recommend it in daily use. But no son of dad's was going to be disabled. Think of it as "reported intention". (Bit weird, yeah.)
26. Oktober 2010
Eliot解释得很清楚了,“我的其他兄弟都是好的”。
26. Oktober 2010
看来确实不对,son of dad's不一定是all my brothers,有可能他根本没有兄弟。 这里指他父亲坚决认为儿子不会残疾。 所以那个答案应该是选A
26. Oktober 2010
Haben Sie noch keine Antworten gefunden?
Geben Sie Ihre Fragen ein und lassen Sie sich von Muttersprachlern helfen!