2.25 2015 feel sleepy at 8pm, dont know why, maybe cuz just finish some big work and know there are a car of shit need me to clean up(actually, lt's my other works ) l will learn 2 song every week, and try to increase my vocabulary in 3 months. need ur help:((((((

PTE essay 2 Increasing number of job opportunity seems to be a good news for out society. However, with time passing by, the problem of discrimination is getting serious nowadays. Age comes to be a critical factor in decision making. In terms of that, plenty of unfair dismiss or some other discrimination happens against the old employees. For me, I think it is legal for company to choose their own stuff. For manufactory or Internet Companies, young stuff which are full of energy and creative ideas can help them make more profit. Comparing with the young stuff, the old worker may well have worse health conditions that are not suitable for such fast speed work module. Also, not as fantastic as the younger one, it is hard for the old to get some innovations yet which is essential for every company. Thus, to contain the company’s profit, government should not legislate this discrimination illegal. As in a freedom labor market, both company and labor have right to make their personal decisions. For some companies, the old employees are more wisdom and experienced that they can tackle problem more effectively. Moreover, besides the energetic and creative, there are lots of other characters also matter, such as leadership, teamwork ability and so forth. Thus old stuff are not absolutely in a inferior position. And if the old want to guarantee their future, they could reach a agreement with their company and add it into their contacts. To sum up, some company are prefer old employee, and more important, whether company recruit old employee or not is up to them, government should not interfere them.

PTE essay1 Tobacco is such a prevalent drug attracting over a billion of adult every day. However, long- term consuming tobacco will harm our health condition, what’s worse, will have adverse effect on wider society in terms of health care cost and lost productivity. Thus some voice criticize that governments are obligated to legated to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decision to smoke. Yet, I believe that it is totally a personal decision which should not be interfered by government. Citizens have free to choice their personal things only if they are legal. Every choice is somehow uncertainty accompanying with risk or benefits. Once we have decided, we need to be responsible for the results. To this respect, after enjoying the fantasy illusion made by tobacco, people should accept the undesirable effect of smoking, such as lung disease or even cancer. The government, which is only a public department elected by citizens, have no right to prohibit tobacco from public. From another perspective, cigarettes industry also have brought government huge amount tax each year. In terms of that, if cigarette were forbidden by government, their budget would not be run as well as previous year. And in fact, there are host of other social issue among us remain to be addressed using the budget. Moreover, it is clear that in some developing countries the priority goal is economy growth but not health care. Therefore, tobacco, which bring huge fortune to citizens and country, should not be legitimate to forbid. To sum up, government should respect personal choice, also, government still rely on smoking industry to develop their economy. So whether using tobacco or not is only a personal choice thus government have no right to change by legislate anything.