Wählen Sie aus verschiedenen Englisch Lehrkräften für ...
Posts
essay_moving to regional towns or staying big cities
People living in big cities are facing many problems today. What are the problems? Should government encourage people to live in regional towns?
It is true that there are many problems for people to live in big cities. In my opinion, living in large cities is better than in regional towns.
It is obvious to see the problems in big cities such as traffic congestion, air pollution and crowded public transport. In Beijing, for example, there are millions of cars driving in the city where people have to spend more commuting on travelling to their destinations. This situation causing the other vital issue is that the air quality has become dead because a great number of cars contribute to air pollution. As a result of this, many citizens suffer respiratory diseases which pose a threat to their health. In addition, due to the intensive population of the city, many public transport systems such as buses and subways, are too crowded, which means that most citizens who often experience these vehicles feel uncomfortable.
In spite of those problems above, it is not convenient for civilians to live in regional towns. Although governments make their maximum effort encourage citizens to move from the big cities to rural towns, people do not have the standard of living as the same as living in the metropolises. An example of this is the number of hospitals and schools. Most regional towns lack adequate health care and education resources. This brings a considerable inconvenience for citizens who intend to live in the places where the governments trumpet.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it is necessary for some citizens to live in the regional towns until the governments have provided people with sufficient public services in these places.
0
0
whether women shuld supervise their children or not
The position of women in society has changed markedly in the last twenty years. Many of the problems young people now experience, such as juvenile delinquency, arise from the fact that many married women now work and are not at home to care for their children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that some juveniles tend to commit crime due to the lack of their parents’ supervision. I disagree with the viewpoint that mother is the only person who should supervise the children.
On the one hand, married women used to play an important role in looking after their children all days in the past. However, females’ position has changed dramatically nowadays, so they can achieve their own ambitions. For example, some married females want to struggle for the manager position in the company. Working hard all days and all nights becomes routine and they are reluctant to spend valuable time on their children. As a result of this, their adolescents’ growth without certain guidance often leads to juvenile delinquency. Mothers, therefore, should act as supervisors to monitor their children’s all parts of their lives, which means that the children do not have chances to behave inappropriately.
On the other hand, married women who are the important members of the families have the right to work and contribute their treasure to the families. Married males should take the responsibility of taking care of their children as well. Their young adults behave in the way that the parents should pay equally attention to, otherwise their children may learn anti-social behavior such as theft or robbery that will be the last thing that their parents want. Besides, if the parents needed to work full-time, they could depend on support from their grandparents or other entrusted people to cope with the situation.
To conclusion, while I agree that married women can have the right to work as men do, they should entrust their children to alternative people.
1
0
