IELTS writing (I'd appreciate it if you can correct my essay) Question: Many people believe that formal ‘pen and paper’ examinations are not the best method o f assessing educational achievement. What is your view of examinations? It is recognized by lots of people that formal ‘pen and paper’ examinations are not effective in measuring educational achievement. I am in complete agreement with this opinion for two reasons. On one hand, paper examinations can not assess students’ academic achievement comprehensively. Everyone in this world is born to be unique. As a result, students will have different competences and advantages in different areas of things. For instance, some students may be skilled at introducing their projects to others while some students might be good at designing new algorithms for unsolved problems. Hardly can paper examinations measure students’ competence in doing chemical and biology experiments, despite the fact that in these 2 disciplines the ability to perform experiments is vital. There are different types of intelligence which need to be measured in different ways. On the other hand, students’ academic ability just has partial effects on the performance of examinations. The probability of obtaining a good grade declines dramatically when students are nervous and anxious about the examinations. Not to mention, large number of students will easily become nervous even leading to gradually becoming nauseous. Some students may seek to cheat in the examinations as a consequence of badly concerned about not gaining good grades. So paper examinations sometimes can not reflect students’ educational achievement correctly. Overall, ‘pen and paper’ examinations are not the effective way to measure students’ different aspects of academic achievement because some ability can not be accessed by paper examinations, as well as students’ great anxiety will affect their grades in the examinations.