Cerca tra vari insegnanti di Inglese...
Alexander
Is it correct that in “I wouldn't be sure that it was profitable in 5 years” we don't need the second “would” when talking about the future relative to “be sure”?
2 ago 2026 04:40
Risposte · 12
2
Yes, that's correct. After expressions such as "I wouldn't be sure", "I don't think", or "I doubt", we often use the past tense to refer to a future situation from the speaker's point of view. So: "I wouldn't be sure that it was profitable in five years." is perfectly natural. You could also say: "I wouldn't be sure that it would be profitable in five years." if you want to emphasise the future outcome itself, but the second "would" is optional rather than required. In other words, the first version is completely grammatical and is probably the more natural choice in everyday English.
2 ago 2026 17:04
1
I agree with Gareth Todd.
2 ago 2026 17:33
1
Your phrase is okay but native speakers might say "I'm not sure that it will be profitable in 5 years." That's right, no 2nd would needed.
2 ago 2026 08:19
Non hai ancora trovato le tue risposte?
Scrivi le tue domande e lascia che i madrelingua ti aiutino!

Non perdere l'opportunità di imparare una lingua comodamente da casa tua. Esplora la nostra selezione di insegnanti di lingue esperti e iscriviti subito alla tua prima lezione!