Cerca tra vari insegnanti di Inglese...
GotoBrazil
Why to use "read" rather than "readS"? “Mao must be portrayed as great and glorious. He must not be besmirched,” read one popular comment.
11 lug 2021 15:57
Risposte · 9
2
It is using “read” as the past tense of read. It seems that the comment was already posted so the author used the past tense. you can say, “Mao must be portrayed as great and glorious. He must not be besmirched,” reads one popular comment. which means the same thing but in the present. .
11 luglio 2021
2
It sounds like this is in the passive voice. Read (pronounced “reed”) becomes read (pronounced “red”) in the passive voice. Hope that helps!
11 luglio 2021
1
This is a good question. Asad''s example is correct. The problem is that we spell the word "read" the same, even when we pronounce it differently. You could say it in 2 ways: Reads = (pronounced like reeeeeeeeeeeeeeds" )puts it in the present. Read = ( pronounced like "red") puts it in the past. Either one makes sense. Our spelling system can be confusing sometimes.
11 luglio 2021
1
It's similar to reported speech, so you're telling me about something someone else said, so it is in the past tense. ReadS is a present tense form.
11 luglio 2021
你好,有唔有興趣一齊學習英文?我想搵個夥伴齊齊學習
13 luglio 2021
Non hai ancora trovato le tue risposte?
Scrivi le tue domande e lascia che i madrelingua ti aiutino!

Non perdere l'opportunità di imparare una lingua comodamente da casa tua. Esplora la nostra selezione di insegnanti di lingue esperti e iscriviti subito alla tua prima lezione!