Richard-Business Eng
Insegnante professionista
The Importance of Clear Business Communications - Poorly written and oral language causes business losses

Did your supervisor or manager or teacher ever give you instructions that were as clear as mud*?

* clear as mud is an idiom that means very difficult to understand:  His instructions were as clear as mud.


In business, we must communicate well with our colleagues and our clients.
That means we must speak slowly and clearly and write properly using the appropriate vocabulary and good grammar.

Communicating well is difficult even in our native languages but it is much more difficult when we are using our second language.

TIP:  If you write something to send to a co-worker or a customer, read it before you send it and ask yourself: 
(1)  Are there any grammar, spelling, or punctuation mistakes?
(2)  Put yourself in the place of the reader and ask yourself "Will the reader understand what I've written?" (or is it clear as mud)?
(3)  Do I need to make any changes to my message?


The following is a true story about a simple memo that no one understood.

_______________________________________________________________

Joanne supervised 36 professionals in 6 city libraries.
To cut the costs of unnecessary overtime, she issued this one-sentence memo to her staff:

When workloads increase to a level requiring hours in excess of an employee’s regular duty assignment, and when such work is estimated to require a full shift of eight (8) hours or more on two (2) or more consecutive days, even though unscheduled days intervene, an employee’s tour of duty shall be altered so as to include the hours when such work must be done, unless an adverse impact would result from such employee’s absence from his previously scheduled assignment.

After the 36 copies were sent out, Joanne’s office received 26 phone calls asking what the memo meant.
What the other 10 people thought is uncertain.
It took a week to write the new policy.

___________________________________________________________


Are you a native English speaker?
If yes, did you understand the memo?

Are you an English learner?
Did you understand the memo?


Have you ever had trouble reading an Instruction Manual/User Manual for a product or a set of Help Instructions to solve a computer/software problem (e.g., MS Help)?



9 giu 2019 17:00
Commenti · 11
4

I'm a native speaker (with a graduate degree in English), and this reads like nonsense to me.  In particular, I agree with Phil -- the idea of unscheduled days "intervening" in between "consecutive" scheduled days makes no sense. 

Presumably, the idea is just that if more work needs to be done on certain days, the employees' schedules should be changed so as to cover the days when more work needs to be done (rather than having employees work extra days in addition to the days they've already been scheduled -- unless, that is, having employees work extra days is necessary to avoid an "adverse effect," I guess).  But I'm not sure I would have been able to figure this out without Richard's helpful clue "To cut the costs of unnecessary overtime..."  

Richard, great tips.  In fact these are tips that would benefit a lot of native speakers as well.  Many people seem to have the mistaken impression that good English, or advanced or formal English, should be complicated and difficult to read.  It definitely should not!

10 giugno 2019
3

While reading the memo, I felt as if my mind was surfing in the wave of sentences! 

However, let me write it down in my own word(Any correction would be greatly appreciated!):

 At times,  employees might get a spike in workloads to a point where they have to work more hours than it requires for their regular duty assignment. When such situation arises, it may requires a full shift of eight(8) hours or more on two or more consecutive days, even including the unscheduled days if required. So, while dealing with such workload, an employee's tour of duty shall be altered to get more hour to complete such work. However, no compromise shall be done if any adverse impact results due to the absence of employee from his previously scheduled assignment.

And as always, Thank you very much, Richard for your munificence! English learners would definitely be grateful for your kind help!:)

10 giugno 2019
2
My thanks to all who responded
Nada
Aura
Phil
Troglodyte
Gray
John

I did not expect anyone to bravely try to decipher the longgggg memo.
After I read the emo for the first time I asked myself if I felt like trying to understand the memo but it was so long and so complex that I decided not to bother analyzing the message.
So, hats off to those who tries to re-write all or any part of the memo.

My simple goal was to show how writing that makes sense to the author may not make any sense to the reader, hence the importance of writing and speaking clearly.
10 giugno 2019
2
When workloads increase to a point where it is necessary to have to ask employers to work an extra eight hours per shift on two consecutive days, over and above their normal regular (legal) shift hours, even though these extra days are unscheduled due to the increase in our (the company's) un expected workload, an employees work hours and/or shift times shall be altered, so as too also include the employers normal, regular (legal/contracted) work that they shall and must do, unless these extra two eight hour shifts were to cause an adverse impact on the employers ability to continue to fulfil, their normal/regular (legal/contracted), such that they may decide to take time of from their normal shifts or leave/ hand in their resignations, all extra work asked of you, you will do unless the extra workloads we enforce upon you shall prevent you also carrying out your current duties to the company should the extra unforeseen extra work loads continue indefinitely, all employees will do these extra eight hour shifts with no break that will continue immediately after finishing your current work duties, at no extra pay, employees may only refuse to do these extra work hours or any extra work hour whenever and only when the company does not have any unexpected extra work hours to for any employee.

And and and and and it's impossible to fully conclude the sentence to wrap it up and finally put it to bed with a full stop or period. Each previously written part needs to be explained and verified causing the latest verification to have to be verified and explained. AD INFINITUM !!
10 giugno 2019
2
Great example of bad writing. There's one thing in particular that I'm wondering: If days are “consecutive”, how can unscheduled days (or any other days) possibly “intervene”? Can anybody explain that? The whole sentence, while grammatically correct, rich in vocabulary, and properly punctuated, is complete gobbledygook. 

9 giugno 2019
Mostra altro