Controversial Food: Is It Right To Judge? (Part 3, end) Then, it dawns on me what I said about me and not eating dogs before, so…how come I consider dogs better than horses? Don’t they, horses deserve some sort of human kindness too? Again, tricky. I’m more inclined to think that we should eschew our personal feelings towards the issue and instead focus on what’s objective and what is not. At the end of the days, the issue is killing animals, that’s about it. If you are fine with it, then you may need to refrain from falling face-first into this these misconceptions and clichés and focus instead on topics such as animal welfare or sustainability since a perfect animal-humans world interaction is probably a pipe dream. You must remain objective, don’t believe everything you read or hear but contrast instead, and use reliable sources. It drives me bonkers every time I read flawing sources having to do with the topics I mentioned here and propaganda aimed at raising awareness about the plight of certain kind of foods arise from just personal interests. Sometimes I find these controversies easier to clear up, like kangaroo meat. I’m not entirely sure how popular this marsupial meat actually is in Australia but I reckon there must be a fair explanation if the consumption of it has gained momentum. As long as the meat is proved to be healthy and safe, and bearing in mind Australia might be a country thronged with them, kangaroo meat makes it a reasonable product to purchase. Well, this entry is taking way too long so if you get to the end of it, thank you for reading. I’m not sure how conclude this article and I would even say I’m more confused about controversial food than in the beginning! So, let’s stick on this axiom commonly claimed by my namesake, Andrew Zimmerman on Bizarre Foods’ TV show: If it looks good, eat it! (Part 3, end)