Escaping to the countryside. Should we?

The Modern and noisy life in large industrial cities are noisy! This have prompted more and more people many to escape into the countryside. This idea tendency sounds great, and yet, there are several issues that can objections might also be raised. Based on my own experiences and observations, I think that, In my opinion, on the balance, retired people and the elderly might greatly benefit from leaving cities for the countryside. Whereas, while children and the working-aged people are recommended to live in cities for better education and career.

There are many advantages living in large cities. There are  first point i want to say is the perfect community facilities places such as museums, opera houses, parks, or amusement attractions, to name but a few. Public transportation, for instance, is always reasonable and affordable, with fair price. Furthermore, and most companies are located in the city, so there are hence many job opportunities enabling people to be employed. Even if ones For those desiring to run start their own business, cities could can provide them sterling conditions. [Not true, LA, is horrible to start a business!] Because the majority of cooperation as well as wealthy people are available in cities, the market for business is much more potential[Rich people have their weekend villas in the countryside, far from the maddening crowds!] . There are also cities have city services to meet the public's demands, varying from health-care to finance. [Again not true.  Just look at the number of cities going bankrupt or lack of services.  Do you know that Beverly Hills do not have its own hospital?] Excellent education provided in the cities is also a great blessing.  [Again not true, there are areas in the poor neighbourhoods of LA has the worst schools.  Just look at South LA!]

On the other hand, many people would disagree with the idea of living in cities. Considering the noisy life noise and its fast pace of living,  they claim the countryside is relatively more optimum [optimum mean the best, at the highest peak] better. The country environment is less polluted and greener with a more slow paced and relaxing lifestyle.  Then there is less crime here and people are much friendlier, and more hospitable.

Would such a country lifestyle be more suitable for the young and ambitious to pursue their dreams? Can it provide better education than cities? The answers to these questions are an explicitly "no" to each of them. The countryside do not offer better opportunities.

Even though escaping to the countryside is ideal, it is dependent on a person's idea of what kind of lifestyle they wish to pursue.  I feel that country, for its qualities, pros, would be the best place for the elderly, while for the young city life would be more conducive for them.

From the point arguing for your belief, I find them very weak and not very convincing.  You are creating separate classes and worse still discrimination based on artificial criteria such as age.  Your implication here is that old people cannot learn or enjoy life in the city.