Is it better to have a modern tourist industry or to leave the coast and the countryside unspoiled? FCE

Who has never felt that sensation of lost and disappointment when a stunning vista is ruined by the presence of a building? Personally, when I find a point of break in a landscape balance, my attention is inevitably captured by that element. What to a perfectionist admirer seems a ruin, to a local citizen could appear like a good search of money and employment for the wealth of the city. We have to criticize objectively, for instance, in case of a bar placed on the seaside or a chalet in a mountain city these structures aren't interfering with the geographical conformation. In fact, when there's the need to build anything in a public space, it's compulsory to get the allowance from the appropriate authority which has the legal capacities to decide what can be built or not. Often in ancient suburbs with antique style, architects are asked to combine the new design with the one of the pre-existing structures. We should exploit what the nature provides without changing extremely the environment. To conclude, with the growing amount of tourists it's impossible to avoid the rising of buildings to host them, but firstly in the respect of nature and protected areas.

---

Just so you know, I only corrected spelling errors and a few punctation errors. Some of these sentences are a bit long. Maybe try to break your ideas into shorter sentences.