Asking for help
hello, everyone, here are sentences from my paper,but there are some errors and improper grammar,so I need your help for corrections.
There is still room for language improvement, For example, “the activity of particles by enlarge self-diffusion coefficient of particles.”, “electrostatic field are more effective”; “Alternating Current field with different frequency have been applied”; “800KHz and 700Khz”; “self-diffusion coefficient of Ca2+ and water molecular”; “the impacts on scale crystallization process caused by the changes was also studied”; “within a acceptable range”; “external electric field influence the viscosity of CaCl2 aqueous solution.”; “The external electric field effects the interactions of molecules”; “which is concluded in the section 0) ”; “3.2 Self-diffusion coefficient of Ca2+ and water molecular”; “So there is no obvious evidence can make sure what frequency is more effective.”
Cerca tra vari insegnanti di Inglese...
Correzioni · 2
2
Asking for help
hello, everyone, here are sentences from my paper,but there are some errors and improper grammar,so I need your help for corrections.……..( without the context available, the changes may not be correct)
“the activity of particles by enlarge self-diffusion coefficient of particles.” (doesn't make sense)
“electrostatic field are more effective”; (past tense “electrostatic field was more effective”)
“Alternating Current field with different frequency have been applied”; ( “An alternating current field with a different frequency was applied” - change to plural if appropriate)
“800KHz and 700Khz”; (spelling of KHz)
“self-diffusion coefficient of Ca2+ and water molecular”; (molecules)
“the impacts on scale crystallization process caused by the changes was also studied”; (impact is singular - impact on the ….)
“within a acceptable range”; (an)
“external electric field influence the viscosity of CaCl2 aqueous solution.”; (influenced)
“The external electric field effects the interactions of molecules”; ("affects" not effects)
“which is concluded in the section 0) ”; (as concluded…in section...)
“3.2 Self-diffusion coefficient of Ca2+ and water molecular”; (see above)
“So there is no obvious evidence can make sure what frequency is more effective.” (The results do not show which frequency is more effective)
0
Asking for help
Hello, everyone!, Here there are (some) sentences from my paper, but there are some errors and improper grammar; so I need your help for correcting them.There is still room for language improvement. For example, “the activity of particles by an enlarged self-diffusion coefficient of particles.”, “electrostatic fields are more effective”; “ (An) alternating current field with different frequency has been applied”; “800 kHz and 700 kHz”; “self-diffusion coefficient of Ca2+ and water molecules”; “the impacts on the scale of the crystallization process caused by the changes were also studied”; “within an acceptable range”; “external electric fields influence the viscosity of CaCl2 aqueous solutions.”; “The external electric field affects the interactions of molecules”; “which is concluded in the section 0) ”; “3.2 Self-diffusion coefficient of Ca2+ and water molecules”; “So, there is no obvious evidence can make sure to evaluate/ascertain what frequency is more effective.”
Best Regards,
Al
Vuoi progredire più velocemente?
Unisciti a questa comunità di apprendimento e prova gli esercizi gratuiti!
Non perdere l'opportunità di imparare una lingua comodamente da casa tua. Esplora la nostra selezione di insegnanti di lingue esperti e iscriviti subito alla tua prima lezione!
Inizia a imparare oggi
