Please correct me if I'm wrong...
"모든 것을 할 여유.그리고 아무것도 히지 않을 자유. 웬만해선 둘 중 하나도 갖기 힘든 그 두 가지 조건을 모두 갖추고 있는 사람."

These sentences is too long so I'm afraid that I misunderstood the meaning.
My take on them is:

"He can afford to do everything and he also cannot do anything in freedom. He is a person who has both circumstances though one of them is tolerable, it is still difficult to deal with."

I really appreciate any help. Thank you!^^

Question

Please correct me if I'm wrong...
"모든 것을 할 여유.그리고 아무것도 히지 않을 자유. 웬만해선 둘 중 하나도 갖기 힘든 그 두 가지 조건을 모두 갖추고 있는 사람."

These sentences is too long so I'm afraid that I misunderstood the meaning.
My take on them is:

"He can afford to do everything and he also cannot do anything in freedom. He is a person who has both circumstances though one of them is tolerable, it is still difficult to deal with."

I really appreciate any help. Thank you!^^

Answer

The sentences you mentioned are very philosophical.
I wonder how you know the sentence.

I'm a little afraid if I explain it correctly because of my poor English. :)
HTH.

"though one of them is tolerable, it is still difficult to deal with."
=> even though it's difficult for other people to have one of them..