Cerca tra vari insegnanti di Inglese...
Andrés
Is "would" more than an auxiliare verb?
Look at this sentence:
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we would otherwise"
Why "would" doesn't need here of any complementary verb? Can "would" work alone?
Can I change "would" for "could" on this example?
23 lug 2019 15:32
Risposte · 4
Thank you Chris, your advice always is really good
23 luglio 2019
Would takes a verb object. Here "we would " is an elliptical version of "we would spend."
The statement is an implicit type 2 conditional. (rephrase) "Sunscreen emboldens us to spend more time in the sun than we WOULD SPEND otherwise (= if we didn't use/have sunscreen).
Here, the modal could can replace would with no significant change in meaning. Like would, could takes a verb object. (rephrase) "Sunscreen emboldens us to spend more time in the sun than we COULD SPEND otherwise (= if we didn't use/have sunscreen).
23 luglio 2019
Thank you Kyler Shea, very good answer, it's clear!
23 luglio 2019
"Would" is a verb. It doesn't need a complimentary verb. It works alone. You can change "would" for "could" but the meaning is a little different. Also, switching "otherwise" and "would" sounds more natural. You can say:
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we otherwise would"
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we otherwise could"
Both are good sentences
23 luglio 2019
Non hai ancora trovato le tue risposte?
Scrivi le tue domande e lascia che i madrelingua ti aiutino!
Andrés
Competenze linguistiche
Inglese, Francese, Portoghese, Spagnolo
Lingua di apprendimento
Inglese, Francese, Portoghese
Altri articoli che potrebbero piacerti

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
17 consensi · 13 Commenti

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
15 consensi · 12 Commenti

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
12 consensi · 6 Commenti
Altri articoli
