And today, the conclusion Ok, the short version of the discussion was something like that: Picasso, was a great artist who influenced and changed the art and probably could have the best chance to survive in the island due his creativity and ideas. In the opposite, although his art was important, his contribution for mankind history and evolution is less relevant than the other two characters were. Karl Marx, was a very important prussian philosopher and his ideas changed the world literally and also the way to live for many people. He was a rich man, who thought in the worker class, critical with the capitalism and father of the communism. Moreover, his ideas were implemented in the wrong way in many countries, although it really wasn’t his fault. Bill Gates, was co-founder of Microsoft, one of the biggest software company ever. His software changed the world in the 80’s – 90’s decade. But the really interesting point it is that he and his wife, are the biggest philanthropist in the world. The used theirs billions of $ helping poor people around the world and convinced other rich people to do the same. Even the medical research has been supported by them, with the necessary founds to develop a vaccine for the malaria. On the other hand, there is polemic about how he started his business and his aggressive monopoly tactics. My team defended Bill Gates and proposed that Picasso should jump. We thought that Bill and Karl could have a very interesting conversation about how to get a better world. However, the democratic decision was that Bill Gates should be the jumper. My conclusion is that the world is crazy, isn’t it? Or perhaps I’m crazy, who knows ^^. What do you think? Bye!